File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Daily Ups and Downs: An Event-Sampling Study of the Mediated Moderation of Prosocial Engagement on Well-Being

TitleDaily Ups and Downs: An Event-Sampling Study of the Mediated Moderation of Prosocial Engagement on Well-Being
Authors
Keywordswell-being
two process model
prosociality
self-determination theory
event-sampling method
Issue Date2018
Citation
Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2018, v. 9, n. 6, p. 675-688 How to Cite?
Abstract© The Author(s) 2017. Numerous studies have shown that acting prosocially promotes the altruist’s well-being. What has been less clear, however, is when the effect is the strongest and what mechanism is behind the well-being benefits of prosocial action. We asked a community sample (N = 383) to record their prosocial engagement, well-being levels, and autonomy, relatedness, and competence 4 times daily for 2 weeks using an app-based event-sampling method. We found that only one’s competence—and neither autonomy nor relatedness—at one time point (t − 1) moderated the effect of prosocial engagement on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being at a subsequent time point (t). Specifically, when participants reported lower competence levels at t − 1, the relationship between acting prosocially and well-being was stronger at t. We further demonstrated that this interaction was mediated by competence levels at t.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/266818
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.3
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.489
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHui, Bryant P.H.-
dc.contributor.authorKogan, Aleksandr-
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-31T07:19:42Z-
dc.date.available2019-01-31T07:19:42Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationSocial Psychological and Personality Science, 2018, v. 9, n. 6, p. 675-688-
dc.identifier.issn1948-5506-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/266818-
dc.description.abstract© The Author(s) 2017. Numerous studies have shown that acting prosocially promotes the altruist’s well-being. What has been less clear, however, is when the effect is the strongest and what mechanism is behind the well-being benefits of prosocial action. We asked a community sample (N = 383) to record their prosocial engagement, well-being levels, and autonomy, relatedness, and competence 4 times daily for 2 weeks using an app-based event-sampling method. We found that only one’s competence—and neither autonomy nor relatedness—at one time point (t − 1) moderated the effect of prosocial engagement on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being at a subsequent time point (t). Specifically, when participants reported lower competence levels at t − 1, the relationship between acting prosocially and well-being was stronger at t. We further demonstrated that this interaction was mediated by competence levels at t.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofSocial Psychological and Personality Science-
dc.subjectwell-being-
dc.subjecttwo process model-
dc.subjectprosociality-
dc.subjectself-determination theory-
dc.subjectevent-sampling method-
dc.titleDaily Ups and Downs: An Event-Sampling Study of the Mediated Moderation of Prosocial Engagement on Well-Being-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1948550617722197-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85041282295-
dc.identifier.hkuros307625-
dc.identifier.volume9-
dc.identifier.issue6-
dc.identifier.spage675-
dc.identifier.epage688-
dc.identifier.eissn1948-5514-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000444561200005-
dc.identifier.issnl1948-5506-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats