File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Book Chapter: Noun-modifying clauses in Cantonese

TitleNoun-modifying clauses in Cantonese
Authors
KeywordsCantonese
Relative clauses
Noun modification
Typology
Resumptive pronouns
Issue Date2017
PublisherJohn Benjamins Publishing Company
Citation
Noun-modifying clauses in Cantonese. In Matsumoto; Y, Comrie, B and Sells, P (Eds.), Noun-Modifying Clause Constructions in Languages of Eurasia: rethinking theoretical and geographical boundaries, p. 105-120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2017 How to Cite?
AbstractWhether relative clauses can be identified in Chinese is a recurrent question. This paper asks whether relative clauses are distinct from other noun-modifying clause constructions in Cantonese, one of many East Asian languages in which a noun can be preceded by a range of modifying clauses. The relationship between head noun and modifying clause may be a grammatical one, with the head noun being understood as an argument or an adjunct of the modifying clause; or it may be dependent on semantic and pragmatic factors. We conclude that Cantonese instantiates the General Noun-Modifying Clause Construction as proposed for Japanese (Matsumoto et al, this volume), with relative clauses forming a subset of modifying clauses in which a grammatical relation obtains.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/264551
ISBN
ISSN
Series/Report no.Typological studies in language; 116

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMatthews, SJ-
dc.contributor.authorYip, V-
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-22T07:56:50Z-
dc.date.available2018-10-22T07:56:50Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationNoun-modifying clauses in Cantonese. In Matsumoto; Y, Comrie, B and Sells, P (Eds.), Noun-Modifying Clause Constructions in Languages of Eurasia: rethinking theoretical and geographical boundaries, p. 105-120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2017-
dc.identifier.isbn9789027206978-
dc.identifier.issn0167-7373-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/264551-
dc.description.abstractWhether relative clauses can be identified in Chinese is a recurrent question. This paper asks whether relative clauses are distinct from other noun-modifying clause constructions in Cantonese, one of many East Asian languages in which a noun can be preceded by a range of modifying clauses. The relationship between head noun and modifying clause may be a grammatical one, with the head noun being understood as an argument or an adjunct of the modifying clause; or it may be dependent on semantic and pragmatic factors. We conclude that Cantonese instantiates the General Noun-Modifying Clause Construction as proposed for Japanese (Matsumoto et al, this volume), with relative clauses forming a subset of modifying clauses in which a grammatical relation obtains.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherJohn Benjamins Publishing Company-
dc.relation.ispartofNoun-Modifying Clause Constructions in Languages of Eurasia: rethinking theoretical and geographical boundaries-
dc.relation.ispartofseriesTypological studies in language; 116-
dc.subjectCantonese-
dc.subjectRelative clauses-
dc.subjectNoun modification-
dc.subjectTypology-
dc.subjectResumptive pronouns-
dc.titleNoun-modifying clauses in Cantonese-
dc.typeBook_Chapter-
dc.identifier.emailMatthews, SJ: matthews@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityMatthews, SJ=rp01207-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1075/tsl.116.06mat-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85078426633-
dc.identifier.hkuros294882-
dc.identifier.spage105-
dc.identifier.epage120-
dc.publisher.placeAmsterdam-
dc.identifier.issnl0167-7373-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats