File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Flow characteristics of Luer and non-Luer spinal needles

TitleFlow characteristics of Luer and non-Luer spinal needles
Authors
KeywordsAnaesthesia spinal
Needles
Connectors spinal
Issue Date2017
PublisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2044
Citation
Anaesthesia, 2017, v. 72 n. 6, p. 749-754 How to Cite?
AbstractWe investigated the flow rates of 25‐G and 27‐G spinal needles, of 90‐mm and 120‐mm lengths, from Vygon, BD, B. Braun and Pajunk; the needles had either a Luer connector, or a Surety® or UniVia® non‐Luer connector. We used a bench‐top model of entering the spinal space, pressurised to 35 cmH2O to simulate cerebrospinal fluid pressure in the sitting position. We examined the time to first appearance of simulated cerebrospinal fluid in the needle hub, as well as the amount of fluid collected over 120 s after the needle was introduced. The mean (SD) times to first appearance of fluid in the needle hub of Luer spinal needles varied from 0.36 (0.22) s for the 25‐G 90‐mm BD to 3.14 (0.72) s for the 27‐G 120‐mm B. Braun, and in the non‐Luer spinal needles from 0.22 (0.17) s for the 25‐G 90‐mm B. Braun to 2.99 (0.71) s for the 27‐G 120‐mm Pajunk. There was a significant difference in the time to first appearance of fluid in the needle hub between Luer and non‐Luer needles of the same type for seven of 14 comparisons made, of which four showed slower appearance of fluid in the non‐Luer version. In some of these cases, the time to appearance of fluid was nearly twice as long with the non‐Luer counterpart. The mean (SD) weight of fluid collected in 120 s using the Luer spinal needles varied from 0.21 (0.05) g for the 27‐G 120‐mm Pajunk to 1.21 (0.18) g for the 25‐G 90‐mm Vygon, and using the non‐Luer spinal needles from 0.25 (0.05) g for the 27‐G 120‐mm Pajunk to 1.55 (0.05) g for the 25‐G 90‐mm B. Braun. All of the needle types showed a greater weight of fluid collected using the non‐Luer compared with the Luer version, with six of the 14 needle types showing a significant difference. Significant variations in flow were also seen between the same needle type from different manufacturers. We conclude that changing from Luer to non‐Luer versions of spinal needles does not merely change the hub design and connection, but may introduce important differences in function.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/263955
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 7.5
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.400
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMonteiro, RS-
dc.contributor.authorPillai, A-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, SW-
dc.contributor.authorBogod, D-
dc.contributor.authorYentis, SM-
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-22T07:47:10Z-
dc.date.available2018-10-22T07:47:10Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationAnaesthesia, 2017, v. 72 n. 6, p. 749-754-
dc.identifier.issn0003-2409-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/263955-
dc.description.abstractWe investigated the flow rates of 25‐G and 27‐G spinal needles, of 90‐mm and 120‐mm lengths, from Vygon, BD, B. Braun and Pajunk; the needles had either a Luer connector, or a Surety® or UniVia® non‐Luer connector. We used a bench‐top model of entering the spinal space, pressurised to 35 cmH2O to simulate cerebrospinal fluid pressure in the sitting position. We examined the time to first appearance of simulated cerebrospinal fluid in the needle hub, as well as the amount of fluid collected over 120 s after the needle was introduced. The mean (SD) times to first appearance of fluid in the needle hub of Luer spinal needles varied from 0.36 (0.22) s for the 25‐G 90‐mm BD to 3.14 (0.72) s for the 27‐G 120‐mm B. Braun, and in the non‐Luer spinal needles from 0.22 (0.17) s for the 25‐G 90‐mm B. Braun to 2.99 (0.71) s for the 27‐G 120‐mm Pajunk. There was a significant difference in the time to first appearance of fluid in the needle hub between Luer and non‐Luer needles of the same type for seven of 14 comparisons made, of which four showed slower appearance of fluid in the non‐Luer version. In some of these cases, the time to appearance of fluid was nearly twice as long with the non‐Luer counterpart. The mean (SD) weight of fluid collected in 120 s using the Luer spinal needles varied from 0.21 (0.05) g for the 27‐G 120‐mm Pajunk to 1.21 (0.18) g for the 25‐G 90‐mm Vygon, and using the non‐Luer spinal needles from 0.25 (0.05) g for the 27‐G 120‐mm Pajunk to 1.55 (0.05) g for the 25‐G 90‐mm B. Braun. All of the needle types showed a greater weight of fluid collected using the non‐Luer compared with the Luer version, with six of the 14 needle types showing a significant difference. Significant variations in flow were also seen between the same needle type from different manufacturers. We conclude that changing from Luer to non‐Luer versions of spinal needles does not merely change the hub design and connection, but may introduce important differences in function.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2044-
dc.relation.ispartofAnaesthesia-
dc.subjectAnaesthesia spinal-
dc.subjectNeedles-
dc.subjectConnectors spinal-
dc.titleFlow characteristics of Luer and non-Luer spinal needles-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailChoi, SW: htswchoi@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityChoi, SW=rp02552-
dc.description.naturelink_to_OA_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/anae.13851-
dc.identifier.pmid28251614-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85014122880-
dc.identifier.hkuros294132-
dc.identifier.volume72-
dc.identifier.issue6-
dc.identifier.spage749-
dc.identifier.epage754-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000400994600011-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-
dc.identifier.issnl0003-2409-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats