File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Pure laparoscopic hepatectomy with augmented reality-assisted indocyanine green fluorescence versus open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma with liver cirrhosis: A propensity analysis at a single center

TitlePure laparoscopic hepatectomy with augmented reality-assisted indocyanine green fluorescence versus open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma with liver cirrhosis: A propensity analysis at a single center
Authors
KeywordsAugmented reality
Cirrhosis
laparoscopic hepatectomy
Issue Date2018
PublisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1758-5910
Citation
Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery, 2018, v. 11 n. 2, p. 104-111 How to Cite?
AbstractMETHODS: From January 2015 to June 2016, 20 patients with HCC and liver cirrhosis underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy with ICG immunofluorescence. The outcomes of pure laparoscopic hepatectomy with ICG immunofluorescence were compared with those of open hepatectomy. To avoid selection bias, patients were propensity score matched in a ratio of 1 : 6, with 20 patients in the laparoscopic group and 120 in the open group. RESULTS: The laparoscopic group had 20 patients, and the open group had 120 patients. The laparoscopic group had less blood loss (125 vs 450 mL, P < 0.001), a shorter operation time (200 vs 250 min, P = 0.003), and a shorter hospital stay (5 vs 6 days, P < 0.001). The complication rate was 0% in the laparoscopic group compared to 15.0% in the open group (P = 0.135). All patients in the laparoscopic group had negative margin involvement. Four patients (3.3%) in the open resection group had positive margin involvement. Two patients in the ICG immunofluorescence group had additional lesions identified and resected during operation. CONCLUSION: Pure laparoscopic hepatectomy with ICG immunofluorescence for primary HCC can be carried out safely with favorable short-term outcomes even in cirrhotic patients. Better identification of the bile duct structure and better assessment of the tumor resection margin and perfusion are advantages of this new technique. INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic hepatectomy is considered an acceptable treatment of choice in selected patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Whether indocyanine green (ICG) immunofluorescence, a new technology, may improve surgery outcomes has yet to be tested. The aim of the present study was to investigate and compare the effect of ICG fluorescence imaging on the outcomes of pure laparoscopic hepatectomy and open hepatectomy for primary HCC with background cirrhosis.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/259531
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 0.9
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.390
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCheung, TT-
dc.contributor.authorMa, KW-
dc.contributor.authorShe, WH-
dc.contributor.authorDai, WC-
dc.contributor.authorTsang, HYS-
dc.contributor.authorChan, ACY-
dc.contributor.authorChok, KSH-
dc.contributor.authorLo, CM-
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-03T04:09:27Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-03T04:09:27Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationAsian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery, 2018, v. 11 n. 2, p. 104-111-
dc.identifier.issn1758-5910-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/259531-
dc.description.abstractMETHODS: From January 2015 to June 2016, 20 patients with HCC and liver cirrhosis underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy with ICG immunofluorescence. The outcomes of pure laparoscopic hepatectomy with ICG immunofluorescence were compared with those of open hepatectomy. To avoid selection bias, patients were propensity score matched in a ratio of 1 : 6, with 20 patients in the laparoscopic group and 120 in the open group. RESULTS: The laparoscopic group had 20 patients, and the open group had 120 patients. The laparoscopic group had less blood loss (125 vs 450 mL, P < 0.001), a shorter operation time (200 vs 250 min, P = 0.003), and a shorter hospital stay (5 vs 6 days, P < 0.001). The complication rate was 0% in the laparoscopic group compared to 15.0% in the open group (P = 0.135). All patients in the laparoscopic group had negative margin involvement. Four patients (3.3%) in the open resection group had positive margin involvement. Two patients in the ICG immunofluorescence group had additional lesions identified and resected during operation. CONCLUSION: Pure laparoscopic hepatectomy with ICG immunofluorescence for primary HCC can be carried out safely with favorable short-term outcomes even in cirrhotic patients. Better identification of the bile duct structure and better assessment of the tumor resection margin and perfusion are advantages of this new technique. INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic hepatectomy is considered an acceptable treatment of choice in selected patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Whether indocyanine green (ICG) immunofluorescence, a new technology, may improve surgery outcomes has yet to be tested. The aim of the present study was to investigate and compare the effect of ICG fluorescence imaging on the outcomes of pure laparoscopic hepatectomy and open hepatectomy for primary HCC with background cirrhosis.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1758-5910-
dc.relation.ispartofAsian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery-
dc.subjectAugmented reality-
dc.subjectCirrhosis-
dc.subjectlaparoscopic hepatectomy-
dc.titlePure laparoscopic hepatectomy with augmented reality-assisted indocyanine green fluorescence versus open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma with liver cirrhosis: A propensity analysis at a single center-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailCheung, TT: cheung68@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailShe, WH: brianshe@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailDai, WC: daiwc@HKUCC-COM.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailChan, ACY: acchan@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailChok, KSH: chok6275@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailLo, CM: chungmlo@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityCheung, TT=rp02129-
dc.identifier.authorityChan, ACY=rp00310-
dc.identifier.authorityChok, KSH=rp02110-
dc.identifier.authorityLo, CM=rp00412-
dc.description.naturelink_to_OA_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ases.12492-
dc.identifier.pmid29747235-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85054896706-
dc.identifier.hkuros288586-
dc.identifier.volume11-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage104-
dc.identifier.epage111-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000434052300002-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-
dc.identifier.issnl1758-5902-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats