File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Do universal adhesives promote bonding to dentin? A systematic review and meta-analysis

TitleDo universal adhesives promote bonding to dentin? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors
Issue Date2018
PublisherDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, Seoul National University. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.rde.ac/
Citation
Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics, 2018, v. 43, p. e29 How to Cite?
AbstractObjectives The aims of this study were to conduct a systematic review of the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of multi-mode adhesives to dentin and to perform a meta-analysis to assess the significance of differences in the µTBS of one of the most commonly used universal adhesives (Scotchbond Universal, 3M ESPE) depending on whether the etch-and-rinse or self-etch mode was used. Materials and Methods An electronic search was performed of MEDLINE/PubMed, ScienceDirect, and EBSCOhost. Laboratory studies that evaluated the µTBS of multi-mode adhesives to dentin using either the etch-and-rinse or self-etch mode were selected. A meta-analysis was conducted of the reviewed studies to quantify the differences in the µTBS of Scotchbond Universal adhesive. Results Only 10 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria for the systematic review. Extensive variation was found in the restorative materials, testing methodologies, and failure mode in the reviewed articles. Furthermore, variation was also observed in the dimensions of the microtensile testing beams. The meta-analysis showed no statistically significant difference between the etch-and-rinse and self-etch modes for Scotchbond Universal adhesive (p > 0.05). Conclusions Multi-mode ‘universal’ adhesives can achieve substantial bonding to dentin, regardless of the used modes (either etch-and-rinse or self-etch).
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/258523
ISSN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorElkaffas, AA-
dc.contributor.authorHamama, HHHE-
dc.contributor.authorMahmoud, SH-
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-22T01:39:53Z-
dc.date.available2018-08-22T01:39:53Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationRestorative Dentistry & Endodontics, 2018, v. 43, p. e29-
dc.identifier.issn2234-7658-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/258523-
dc.description.abstractObjectives The aims of this study were to conduct a systematic review of the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of multi-mode adhesives to dentin and to perform a meta-analysis to assess the significance of differences in the µTBS of one of the most commonly used universal adhesives (Scotchbond Universal, 3M ESPE) depending on whether the etch-and-rinse or self-etch mode was used. Materials and Methods An electronic search was performed of MEDLINE/PubMed, ScienceDirect, and EBSCOhost. Laboratory studies that evaluated the µTBS of multi-mode adhesives to dentin using either the etch-and-rinse or self-etch mode were selected. A meta-analysis was conducted of the reviewed studies to quantify the differences in the µTBS of Scotchbond Universal adhesive. Results Only 10 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria for the systematic review. Extensive variation was found in the restorative materials, testing methodologies, and failure mode in the reviewed articles. Furthermore, variation was also observed in the dimensions of the microtensile testing beams. The meta-analysis showed no statistically significant difference between the etch-and-rinse and self-etch modes for Scotchbond Universal adhesive (p > 0.05). Conclusions Multi-mode ‘universal’ adhesives can achieve substantial bonding to dentin, regardless of the used modes (either etch-and-rinse or self-etch).-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, Seoul National University. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.rde.ac/-
dc.relation.ispartofRestorative Dentistry & Endodontics-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.titleDo universal adhesives promote bonding to dentin? A systematic review and meta-analysis-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailHamama, HHHE: hamama@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityHamama, HHHE=rp02187-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.5395/rde.2018.43.e29-
dc.identifier.hkuros287703-
dc.identifier.volume43-
dc.identifier.spagee29-
dc.identifier.epagee29-
dc.publisher.placeRepublic of Korea-
dc.identifier.issnl2234-7658-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats