File Download
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1007/s40961-017-0116-8
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85058786650
- WOS: WOS:000416767800002
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: How To Think About Philosophical Methodology
Title | How To Think About Philosophical Methodology |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Intuition Metaphilosophy Methodology |
Issue Date | 2017 |
Publisher | Springer (India) Private Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.springer.com/philosophy/journal/40961 |
Citation | Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research, 2017, v. 34 n. 3, p. 447-463 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Experimental philosophy, at least in its ‘negative’ variety, has standardly been portrayed as presenting a dramatic challenge to traditional philosophical methodology. As such, it has prompted a large variety of counter-arguments and defenses of intuition. In this paper, I argue that many of these objections to experimental philosophy rest on various oversimplifications that both experimental philosophers and their opponents have made regarding intuitions and philosophical methodology. Once these oversimplifications are abandoned, I argue that the experimentalist critique of current philosophical methods becomes somewhat less dramatic, but also much less open to objection. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/258300 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 0.1 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.102 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Nado, JE | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-08-22T01:36:15Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-08-22T01:36:15Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research, 2017, v. 34 n. 3, p. 447-463 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0970-7794 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/258300 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Experimental philosophy, at least in its ‘negative’ variety, has standardly been portrayed as presenting a dramatic challenge to traditional philosophical methodology. As such, it has prompted a large variety of counter-arguments and defenses of intuition. In this paper, I argue that many of these objections to experimental philosophy rest on various oversimplifications that both experimental philosophers and their opponents have made regarding intuitions and philosophical methodology. Once these oversimplifications are abandoned, I argue that the experimentalist critique of current philosophical methods becomes somewhat less dramatic, but also much less open to objection. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Springer (India) Private Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.springer.com/philosophy/journal/40961 | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research | - |
dc.rights | The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40961-017-0116-8 | - |
dc.subject | Intuition | - |
dc.subject | Metaphilosophy | - |
dc.subject | Methodology | - |
dc.title | How To Think About Philosophical Methodology | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.email | Nado, JE: nado@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Nado, JE=rp02287 | - |
dc.description.nature | postprint | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s40961-017-0116-8 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85058786650 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 287125 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 34 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 447 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 463 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000416767800002 | - |
dc.publisher.place | India | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0970-7794 | - |