File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: So what if there is income inequality? The distributive consequence of nonfarm employment in rural China

TitleSo what if there is income inequality? The distributive consequence of nonfarm employment in rural China
Authors
Issue Date2001
Citation
Economic Development and Cultural Change, 2001, v. 50, n. 1, p. 19-46 How to Cite?
AbstractIt is interesting to note, that of the studies concerning income distribution in rural China, few have examined the effect of household employment in the nonfarm sector on levels of mean income or, more generally, standard of living. The most important question, from our perspective, is whether nonfarm employment and income opportunity contribute to rising farm household income while simultaneously widening the income gap among the farm households. If so, should we applaud or condemn such a development process? What, if any, is the role of education in facilitating access to nonfarm employment and in determining income? Or are these scarce opportunities allocated by means of a less universalistic criterion, such as personal connections or "social capital"?sAre these opportunities more or less equal in areas where collectives or TVEs assume a less predominant role? These are, we believe, important questions that need to be addressed in relation to the issue of rural income inequality. On the basis of a unique farm survey covering 400 rural households in four predominantly agricultural Chinese counties, this article sets out to answer these questions. The article is organized as follows. Section II describes our surveyed counties and provides an economic profile of 400 farm households there. In Section III, we estimate the income function of these households, and in Section IV we measure directly income inequality among them. In light of the possible disequalizing effect of nonfarm income, we examine its determinants in Section V, and in Section VI we draw some conclusions.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/256869
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.0
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.100
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKung, James K.S.-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Yiu Fai-
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-24T08:58:09Z-
dc.date.available2018-07-24T08:58:09Z-
dc.date.issued2001-
dc.identifier.citationEconomic Development and Cultural Change, 2001, v. 50, n. 1, p. 19-46-
dc.identifier.issn0013-0079-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/256869-
dc.description.abstractIt is interesting to note, that of the studies concerning income distribution in rural China, few have examined the effect of household employment in the nonfarm sector on levels of mean income or, more generally, standard of living. The most important question, from our perspective, is whether nonfarm employment and income opportunity contribute to rising farm household income while simultaneously widening the income gap among the farm households. If so, should we applaud or condemn such a development process? What, if any, is the role of education in facilitating access to nonfarm employment and in determining income? Or are these scarce opportunities allocated by means of a less universalistic criterion, such as personal connections or "social capital"?sAre these opportunities more or less equal in areas where collectives or TVEs assume a less predominant role? These are, we believe, important questions that need to be addressed in relation to the issue of rural income inequality. On the basis of a unique farm survey covering 400 rural households in four predominantly agricultural Chinese counties, this article sets out to answer these questions. The article is organized as follows. Section II describes our surveyed counties and provides an economic profile of 400 farm households there. In Section III, we estimate the income function of these households, and in Section IV we measure directly income inequality among them. In light of the possible disequalizing effect of nonfarm income, we examine its determinants in Section V, and in Section VI we draw some conclusions.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofEconomic Development and Cultural Change-
dc.titleSo what if there is income inequality? The distributive consequence of nonfarm employment in rural China-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1086/321915-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0035734545-
dc.identifier.volume50-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage19-
dc.identifier.epage46-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000174009200002-
dc.identifier.issnl0013-0079-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats