File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Comparison of different theories for focusing through a plane interface: comment

TitleComparison of different theories for focusing through a plane interface: comment
Authors
Jeongmin, K. I.M.Wang, YuanZhang, Xiang
Issue Date2018
Citation
Journal of the Optical Society of America A: Optics and Image Science, and Vision, 2018, v. 35, n. 4, p. 591-592 How to Cite?
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.35.000591
Abstract© 2018 Optical Society of America. In light focusing through a dielectric interface, Wiersma et al. [J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14, 1482 (1997)] claim that the Debye–Wolf diffraction theory and the m-theory predict axial focal fields with “little difference.” We found a possible mistake of using an inaccurate apodization factor in the m-theory integral. Here we correct the apodization factor, which then leads to better agreement on axial intensity distributions between the two theories than reported.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/256844
ISSN
1084-7529
2021 Impact Factor: 2.104
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.803
ISI Accession Number ID
WOS:000428931500053

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJeongmin, K. I.M.-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Yuan-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Xiang-
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-24T08:58:05Z-
dc.date.available2018-07-24T08:58:05Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the Optical Society of America A: Optics and Image Science, and Vision, 2018, v. 35, n. 4, p. 591-592-
dc.identifier.issn1084-7529-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/256844-
dc.description.abstract© 2018 Optical Society of America. In light focusing through a dielectric interface, Wiersma et al. [J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14, 1482 (1997)] claim that the Debye–Wolf diffraction theory and the m-theory predict axial focal fields with “little difference.” We found a possible mistake of using an inaccurate apodization factor in the m-theory integral. Here we correct the apodization factor, which then leads to better agreement on axial intensity distributions between the two theories than reported.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of the Optical Society of America A: Optics and Image Science, and Vision-
dc.titleComparison of different theories for focusing through a plane interface: comment-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1364/JOSAA.35.000591-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85044591971-
dc.identifier.volume35-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.spage591-
dc.identifier.epage592-
dc.identifier.eissn1520-8532-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000428931500053-
dc.identifier.issnl1084-7529-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats

OR

Export to Other Non-XML Formats