File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: A survey of gastro-intestinal parasitic infection in domestic and wild birds in Chittagong and Greater Sylhet, Bangladesh

TitleA survey of gastro-intestinal parasitic infection in domestic and wild birds in Chittagong and Greater Sylhet, Bangladesh
Authors
KeywordsBangladesh
Gastrointestinal parasites
Survey
Domestic and wild birds
Issue Date2014
Citation
Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 2014, v. 117, n. 1, p. 305-312 How to Cite?
Abstract© 2014 Elsevier B.V. A survey of gastrointestinal parasitic infection as determined by faecal examination was conducted among domestic and wild birds in Bangladesh. Birds were sampled from households, wet markets and wetlands in Chittagong and Greater Sylhet districts during April 2012 to February 2013. Mist nets were used to catch resident wild and migratory birds. The overall prevalence of parasitic infection ranged among locations from 25 to 55% in indigenous domestic ducks (live bird samples. = 304), 20% in resident wild birds (environmental faecal samples. = 40) and 40% in migratory birds (live bird samples. = 35). The prevalence of parasitic infection was significantly higher in indigenous domestic ducks collected during summer (39%) than winter (22%) (p= 0.04). In domestic indigenous ducks and Muscovy ducks, both single and multiple types of parasitic infections were found. However, other domestic birds and wild birds often had a single type of parasitic infection. Ascaridia spp. with an average egg load of 50-900, was commonly detected in faecal samples of domestic and wild birds in this study. Other identified parasites were Capillaria spp. and Heterakis spp. both in domestic and wild birds. Improvement of biosecurity measures for household duck farms through educating and motivating household farmers could help mitigate the effects of parasitic infection on production.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/254550
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.2
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.706
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHoque, Md Ahasanul-
dc.contributor.authorHassan, Mohammad Mahmudul-
dc.contributor.authorHaque, Enamul-
dc.contributor.authorShaikat, Amir Hossan-
dc.contributor.authorKhan, Shahneaz Ali-
dc.contributor.authorAlim, Abdul-
dc.contributor.authorSkerratt, Lee Francis-
dc.contributor.authorIslam, Ariful-
dc.contributor.authorTun, Hein Min-
dc.contributor.authorDissanayake, Ravi-
dc.contributor.authorDay, Tapan Kumar-
dc.contributor.authorDebnath, Nitish Chandra-
dc.contributor.authorYamage, Mat-
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-19T15:40:51Z-
dc.date.available2018-06-19T15:40:51Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationPreventive Veterinary Medicine, 2014, v. 117, n. 1, p. 305-312-
dc.identifier.issn0167-5877-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/254550-
dc.description.abstract© 2014 Elsevier B.V. A survey of gastrointestinal parasitic infection as determined by faecal examination was conducted among domestic and wild birds in Bangladesh. Birds were sampled from households, wet markets and wetlands in Chittagong and Greater Sylhet districts during April 2012 to February 2013. Mist nets were used to catch resident wild and migratory birds. The overall prevalence of parasitic infection ranged among locations from 25 to 55% in indigenous domestic ducks (live bird samples. = 304), 20% in resident wild birds (environmental faecal samples. = 40) and 40% in migratory birds (live bird samples. = 35). The prevalence of parasitic infection was significantly higher in indigenous domestic ducks collected during summer (39%) than winter (22%) (p= 0.04). In domestic indigenous ducks and Muscovy ducks, both single and multiple types of parasitic infections were found. However, other domestic birds and wild birds often had a single type of parasitic infection. Ascaridia spp. with an average egg load of 50-900, was commonly detected in faecal samples of domestic and wild birds in this study. Other identified parasites were Capillaria spp. and Heterakis spp. both in domestic and wild birds. Improvement of biosecurity measures for household duck farms through educating and motivating household farmers could help mitigate the effects of parasitic infection on production.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofPreventive Veterinary Medicine-
dc.subjectBangladesh-
dc.subjectGastrointestinal parasites-
dc.subjectSurvey-
dc.subjectDomestic and wild birds-
dc.titleA survey of gastro-intestinal parasitic infection in domestic and wild birds in Chittagong and Greater Sylhet, Bangladesh-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.07.012-
dc.identifier.pmid25132060-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84910150475-
dc.identifier.volume117-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage305-
dc.identifier.epage312-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000346883000034-
dc.identifier.issnl0167-5877-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats