File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Comparison of RapidArc and static gantry intensity-modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma

TitleComparison of RapidArc and static gantry intensity-modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma
Authors
KeywordsTomography, X-ray computed
Nasopharyngeal neoplasms
Radiotherapy, intensity-modulated
Radiotherapy planning
Radiotherapy dosage
Computer-assisted
Issue Date2010
Citation
Journal of the Hong Kong College of Radiologists, 2010, v. 13, n. 3, p. 125-132 How to Cite?
AbstractObjective: RapidArc (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) is a new volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy technique with continuous modulation of gantry speed, dose rate, and multileaf collimator shape. Taking advantages of dose painting capabilities along with rotational delivery, RapidArc has shown promise in the treatment of a wide range of tumours, including intracranial, head and neck, prostate, and endometrial cancers. However, supportive data on RapidArc therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma are scanty. In this study, comparison of the quality of a treatment plan and efficiency of radiation delivery by RapidArc and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma was evaluated. Methods: Datasets of 3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients were used to design both RapidArc and intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans. Results were analysed in terms of dose distribution and dose-volume histograms. Results: For all patients, RapidArc plans provided a comparable homogeneity index and adequate organs-at-risk sparing relative to intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans. In terms of target dose conformity, the conformity index favoured intensity-modulated radiotherapy, especially for higher dose targets using a simultaneous integrated boost approach. Conclusion: Taken together, our preliminary experience in dose optimisation with RapidArc for radiation treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma was able to deliver reasonable treatment plans. Development of a sophisticated planning system with a quick optimisation algorithm and adjustable level of modulation appears crucial to take full advantage of RapidArc technology. With the ever-increasing complexity of RapidArc treatment planning and delivery, further parallel efforts in optimising quality assurance are warranted. © 2010 Hong Kong College of Radiologists.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/251608
ISSN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCheung, W. K.-
dc.contributor.authorLee, K. H.-
dc.contributor.authorCheng, H. C.-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, C. H.-
dc.contributor.authorChan, C. L.-
dc.contributor.authorNgan, K. C.-
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-08T05:00:27Z-
dc.date.available2018-03-08T05:00:27Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the Hong Kong College of Radiologists, 2010, v. 13, n. 3, p. 125-132-
dc.identifier.issn1029-5097-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/251608-
dc.description.abstractObjective: RapidArc (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) is a new volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy technique with continuous modulation of gantry speed, dose rate, and multileaf collimator shape. Taking advantages of dose painting capabilities along with rotational delivery, RapidArc has shown promise in the treatment of a wide range of tumours, including intracranial, head and neck, prostate, and endometrial cancers. However, supportive data on RapidArc therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma are scanty. In this study, comparison of the quality of a treatment plan and efficiency of radiation delivery by RapidArc and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma was evaluated. Methods: Datasets of 3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients were used to design both RapidArc and intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans. Results were analysed in terms of dose distribution and dose-volume histograms. Results: For all patients, RapidArc plans provided a comparable homogeneity index and adequate organs-at-risk sparing relative to intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans. In terms of target dose conformity, the conformity index favoured intensity-modulated radiotherapy, especially for higher dose targets using a simultaneous integrated boost approach. Conclusion: Taken together, our preliminary experience in dose optimisation with RapidArc for radiation treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma was able to deliver reasonable treatment plans. Development of a sophisticated planning system with a quick optimisation algorithm and adjustable level of modulation appears crucial to take full advantage of RapidArc technology. With the ever-increasing complexity of RapidArc treatment planning and delivery, further parallel efforts in optimising quality assurance are warranted. © 2010 Hong Kong College of Radiologists.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of the Hong Kong College of Radiologists-
dc.subjectTomography, X-ray computed-
dc.subjectNasopharyngeal neoplasms-
dc.subjectRadiotherapy, intensity-modulated-
dc.subjectRadiotherapy planning-
dc.subjectRadiotherapy dosage-
dc.subjectComputer-assisted-
dc.titleComparison of RapidArc and static gantry intensity-modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-78651332221-
dc.identifier.volume13-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage125-
dc.identifier.epage132-
dc.identifier.issnl1029-5097-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats