File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Prevention of recurrent central venous stenosis using endovascular irradiation following stent placement in hemodialysis patients

TitlePrevention of recurrent central venous stenosis using endovascular irradiation following stent placement in hemodialysis patients
Authors
KeywordsStents and prostheses
Radiations
Dialysis
Veins, innominate
Issue Date2001
Citation
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, 2001, v. 24, n. 6, p. 400-406 How to Cite?
AbstractThis study was done to evaluate the outcome after brachytherapy (BT) given to prevent restenosis after stent insertion for central venous stenosis in patients with ipsilateral hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas (AVF). Angioplasty and stenting were performed on 9 primary central venous stenoses in 8 patients with AVF followed by BT, delivering Iridium-192 radiation using an afterloading technique. BT was also administered to three patients with five recurrent stenoses at the stent margins. There was no residual stenosis after angioplasty and stenting. Venographic follow-up (77-644 days, mean 272 days) showed no restenosis in seven primary stenoses. New strictures (45%-100%) developed at the stent margin in six veins (five patients). Angioplasty or stenting was performed for five margin stenoses in three patients, followed by a second BT. Residual stenosis before BT was 0-30%. In our venographic follow-up (140-329 days, mean 215 days), three restenoses occurred (35%-100%). All progressed to complete occlusion on later venographic follow-up irrespective of whether BT was given to the stent margin or not. The mean primary and assisted primary patency of the central veins were 359 days and 639 days, respectively. Endovascular irradiation with a noncentering source does not prolong the patency after angioplasty and stenting of central venous stenosis in hemodialysis patients.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/251595
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.8
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.777
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChong-Hei Kwok, Philip-
dc.contributor.authorKai-Cheong Ngan, Roger-
dc.contributor.authorChi-Hum Chan, Susan-
dc.contributor.authorKui-Man Wong, Andrew-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Ming Wong-
dc.contributor.authorWong, Kan Wong-
dc.contributor.authorKa, Yan Wong-
dc.contributor.authorKa, Foon Chau-
dc.contributor.authorChun, Sang Li-
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-08T05:00:25Z-
dc.date.available2018-03-08T05:00:25Z-
dc.date.issued2001-
dc.identifier.citationCardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, 2001, v. 24, n. 6, p. 400-406-
dc.identifier.issn0174-1551-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/251595-
dc.description.abstractThis study was done to evaluate the outcome after brachytherapy (BT) given to prevent restenosis after stent insertion for central venous stenosis in patients with ipsilateral hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas (AVF). Angioplasty and stenting were performed on 9 primary central venous stenoses in 8 patients with AVF followed by BT, delivering Iridium-192 radiation using an afterloading technique. BT was also administered to three patients with five recurrent stenoses at the stent margins. There was no residual stenosis after angioplasty and stenting. Venographic follow-up (77-644 days, mean 272 days) showed no restenosis in seven primary stenoses. New strictures (45%-100%) developed at the stent margin in six veins (five patients). Angioplasty or stenting was performed for five margin stenoses in three patients, followed by a second BT. Residual stenosis before BT was 0-30%. In our venographic follow-up (140-329 days, mean 215 days), three restenoses occurred (35%-100%). All progressed to complete occlusion on later venographic follow-up irrespective of whether BT was given to the stent margin or not. The mean primary and assisted primary patency of the central veins were 359 days and 639 days, respectively. Endovascular irradiation with a noncentering source does not prolong the patency after angioplasty and stenting of central venous stenosis in hemodialysis patients.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofCardioVascular and Interventional Radiology-
dc.subjectStents and prostheses-
dc.subjectRadiations-
dc.subjectDialysis-
dc.subjectVeins, innominate-
dc.titlePrevention of recurrent central venous stenosis using endovascular irradiation following stent placement in hemodialysis patients-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00270-001-0034-6-
dc.identifier.pmid11907747-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0035689433-
dc.identifier.volume24-
dc.identifier.issue6-
dc.identifier.spage400-
dc.identifier.epage406-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000173276400008-
dc.identifier.issnl0174-1551-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats