File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: How china sees the arctic: Reading between extraregional and intraregional narratives

TitleHow china sees the arctic: Reading between extraregional and intraregional narratives
Authors
Issue Date2015
Citation
Geopolitics, 2015, v. 20, n. 3, p. 645-668 How to Cite?
Abstract© Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. In May 2013, China gained observer status in the Arctic Council, exemplifying its growing legitimacy as a regional actor in the eyes of the eight countries with territory north of the Arctic Circle. Yet since China remains an extraregional state without territory in the Arctic, Chinese officials continue to bolster their state’s legitimacy as an Arctic stakeholder through two spatially inconsistent but mutually reinforcing grand regional narratives. On the one hand, Chinese officials recognize the salience of territory and presence in the Arctic, underscoring their country’s “near-Arctic” location and polar scientific expeditions. On the other hand, officials depict the Arctic as a maritime, global space where climate change has potential ramifications for the entire planet. Significantly, these reframings are affecting intraregional states’ perceptions of the Arctic, demonstrating how a region’s territorial extent, symbolic meaning, and institutional form emerge through the ongoing conversation between extraregional and intraregional narratives.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/251147
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.0
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.211
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBennett, Mia M.-
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-01T01:54:44Z-
dc.date.available2018-02-01T01:54:44Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationGeopolitics, 2015, v. 20, n. 3, p. 645-668-
dc.identifier.issn1465-0045-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/251147-
dc.description.abstract© Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. In May 2013, China gained observer status in the Arctic Council, exemplifying its growing legitimacy as a regional actor in the eyes of the eight countries with territory north of the Arctic Circle. Yet since China remains an extraregional state without territory in the Arctic, Chinese officials continue to bolster their state’s legitimacy as an Arctic stakeholder through two spatially inconsistent but mutually reinforcing grand regional narratives. On the one hand, Chinese officials recognize the salience of territory and presence in the Arctic, underscoring their country’s “near-Arctic” location and polar scientific expeditions. On the other hand, officials depict the Arctic as a maritime, global space where climate change has potential ramifications for the entire planet. Significantly, these reframings are affecting intraregional states’ perceptions of the Arctic, demonstrating how a region’s territorial extent, symbolic meaning, and institutional form emerge through the ongoing conversation between extraregional and intraregional narratives.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofGeopolitics-
dc.titleHow china sees the arctic: Reading between extraregional and intraregional narratives-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/14650045.2015.1017757-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84959858158-
dc.identifier.volume20-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage645-
dc.identifier.epage668-
dc.identifier.eissn1557-3028-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000359600700008-
dc.identifier.issnl1465-0045-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats