File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Routinization of divorce law practice in China: Institutional constraints' influence on judicial behaviour

TitleRoutinization of divorce law practice in China: Institutional constraints' influence on judicial behaviour
Authors
Issue Date2008
Citation
International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 2008, v. 23, n. 1, p. 83-109 How to Cite?
AbstractBased on in-depth fieldwork investigations and extensive interviews, this article demonstrates that adjudication has replaced mediated reconciliation and become the dominant way of handling seriously contested divorce petitions in contemporary China. Specifically, for first-time petitions, judges routinely render against divorce. But for second-time petitions, they routinely render adjudicated divorce. This shift is closely linked to recent reforms in the Chinese judiciary and especially the assessment criteria imposed on courts and judges. This article thus argues that the assessment criteria and the institutional constraints of Chinese courts more generally have overwhelmingly affected, if not dictated, the decision-making process of Chinese judges.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/250923
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 0.9
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.297

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHe, Xin-
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-01T01:54:05Z-
dc.date.available2018-02-01T01:54:05Z-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 2008, v. 23, n. 1, p. 83-109-
dc.identifier.issn1360-9939-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/250923-
dc.description.abstractBased on in-depth fieldwork investigations and extensive interviews, this article demonstrates that adjudication has replaced mediated reconciliation and become the dominant way of handling seriously contested divorce petitions in contemporary China. Specifically, for first-time petitions, judges routinely render against divorce. But for second-time petitions, they routinely render adjudicated divorce. This shift is closely linked to recent reforms in the Chinese judiciary and especially the assessment criteria imposed on courts and judges. This article thus argues that the assessment criteria and the institutional constraints of Chinese courts more generally have overwhelmingly affected, if not dictated, the decision-making process of Chinese judges.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Law, Policy and the Family-
dc.titleRoutinization of divorce law practice in China: Institutional constraints' influence on judicial behaviour-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/lawfam/ebn016-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-65349087902-
dc.identifier.volume23-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage83-
dc.identifier.epage109-
dc.identifier.eissn1464-3707-
dc.identifier.issnl1360-9939-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats