File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Conference Paper: Why do they not comply with the law? Illegality and semi-legality among rural-urban migrant entrepreneurs in Beijing

TitleWhy do they not comply with the law? Illegality and semi-legality among rural-urban migrant entrepreneurs in Beijing
Authors
Issue Date2005
Citation
Law and Society Review, 2005, v. 39, n. 3, p. 527-562 How to Cite?
AbstractBased on in-depth interview materials, this article examines why most rural-urban migrant entrepreneurs in Beijing do not fully comply with a discriminatory license requirement, and in particular, why they prefer license-renting from the locals. This article suggests that the law's lack of legitimacy adds weight to instrumental considerations. But more important, this license-renting practice seems to be reinforced and sustained institutionally by local businesses, law enforcement officers, and the local authorities, because their interests are inextricably intertwined with it. The whole situation constitutes a general equilibrium through which various interests are balanced. This case study thus paints a far more complicated picture of the law's impact on people's behavior than usually assumed. Instrumental concerns, or coercive action and sanctions alone, do not adequately explain people's interaction with the law in a "lawless" circumstance; a whole range of instrumental concerns must be considered, and they, together with sanctions, must be understood in the context of a larger institutional environment in which the interactions of various players unfold. © 2005 by The Law and Society Association. All rights reserved.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/250903
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.3
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.840
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHe, Xin-
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-01T01:54:02Z-
dc.date.available2018-02-01T01:54:02Z-
dc.date.issued2005-
dc.identifier.citationLaw and Society Review, 2005, v. 39, n. 3, p. 527-562-
dc.identifier.issn0023-9216-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/250903-
dc.description.abstractBased on in-depth interview materials, this article examines why most rural-urban migrant entrepreneurs in Beijing do not fully comply with a discriminatory license requirement, and in particular, why they prefer license-renting from the locals. This article suggests that the law's lack of legitimacy adds weight to instrumental considerations. But more important, this license-renting practice seems to be reinforced and sustained institutionally by local businesses, law enforcement officers, and the local authorities, because their interests are inextricably intertwined with it. The whole situation constitutes a general equilibrium through which various interests are balanced. This case study thus paints a far more complicated picture of the law's impact on people's behavior than usually assumed. Instrumental concerns, or coercive action and sanctions alone, do not adequately explain people's interaction with the law in a "lawless" circumstance; a whole range of instrumental concerns must be considered, and they, together with sanctions, must be understood in the context of a larger institutional environment in which the interactions of various players unfold. © 2005 by The Law and Society Association. All rights reserved.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofLaw and Society Review-
dc.titleWhy do they not comply with the law? Illegality and semi-legality among rural-urban migrant entrepreneurs in Beijing-
dc.typeConference_Paper-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1540-5893.2005.00233.x-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-25644436306-
dc.identifier.volume39-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage527-
dc.identifier.epage562-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000231691100003-
dc.identifier.issnl0023-9216-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats