File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Norm theory and the action-effect: The role of social norms in regret following action and inaction

TitleNorm theory and the action-effect: The role of social norms in regret following action and inaction
Authors
KeywordsAction-effect
Norm theory
Normality
Social norms
Action
Issue Date2017
PublisherAcademic Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jesp
Citation
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2017, v. 69, p. 111-120 How to Cite?
Abstract© 2016 Elsevier Inc. The action-effect (Kahneman & Tversky, 1982) is one of the most widely cited and replicated effects in the regret literature, showing that negative outcomes are regretted more when they are a result of action compared to inaction. Building on theoretical arguments by norm theory (Kahneman & Miller, 1986) and the concept of normality, we examine the role of social norms for action and inaction in affecting regret. In four experiments we manipulated social norms and action-effect scenarios and found that social norms matter. For decisions resulting in negative outcomes, action is regretted more than inaction when social norms are for inaction, but when social norms are for action the effect is significantly weakened (Experiments 1 and 4) or reversed (Experiments 2 and 3).
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/250342
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.2
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.841
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFeldman, G-
dc.contributor.authorAlbarracín, D-
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-28T07:57:23Z-
dc.date.available2017-12-28T07:57:23Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2017, v. 69, p. 111-120-
dc.identifier.issn0022-1031-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/250342-
dc.description.abstract© 2016 Elsevier Inc. The action-effect (Kahneman & Tversky, 1982) is one of the most widely cited and replicated effects in the regret literature, showing that negative outcomes are regretted more when they are a result of action compared to inaction. Building on theoretical arguments by norm theory (Kahneman & Miller, 1986) and the concept of normality, we examine the role of social norms for action and inaction in affecting regret. In four experiments we manipulated social norms and action-effect scenarios and found that social norms matter. For decisions resulting in negative outcomes, action is regretted more than inaction when social norms are for inaction, but when social norms are for action the effect is significantly weakened (Experiments 1 and 4) or reversed (Experiments 2 and 3).-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherAcademic Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jesp-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Experimental Social Psychology-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectAction-effect-
dc.subjectNorm theory-
dc.subjectNormality-
dc.subjectSocial norms-
dc.subjectAction-
dc.titleNorm theory and the action-effect: The role of social norms in regret following action and inaction-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailFeldman, G: gfeldman@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityFeldman, G=rp02342-
dc.description.naturepostprint-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jesp.2016.07.009-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84995560916-
dc.identifier.hkuros294163-
dc.identifier.volume69-
dc.identifier.spage111-
dc.identifier.epage120-
dc.identifier.eissn1096-0465-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000392774500012-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-
dc.identifier.issnl0022-1031-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats