File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2009.00612.x
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-77958464764
- PMID: 20946248
- WOS: WOS:000283072000003
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: A generic consensus assessment of undergraduate competence in forceps exodontia in the United Kingdom
Title | A generic consensus assessment of undergraduate competence in forceps exodontia in the United Kingdom |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Extraction Undergraduate Competence Exodontia Oral surgery |
Issue Date | 2010 |
Citation | European Journal of Dental Education, 2010, v. 14, n. 4, p. 210-214 How to Cite? |
Abstract | The assessment of competence in clinical skills has become more frequent in published healthcare curricula and syllabuses recently. There are agreed mechanisms for the assessment of competence in the post-graduate environment, but no consensus within the undergraduate curriculum. This paper seeks to develop an agreed generic checklist for the assessment of competence in forceps exodontia.Materials and methods: A modified Delphi process was undertaken with representatives from all UK dental schools (n = 13) to develop a generic checklist for the assessment of competence in forceps exodontia. A content analysis of the assessments employed by each school was used to help discussion and inform the Delphi process.Results: Seven schools currently employ a summative assessment of competence in forceps exodontia, with the majority employing a structured clinical objective test (n = 6). From the seven assessments, there were a total of 29 putative items and 10 putative domains identified for a generic checklist. These were reduced to five domains and 19 items through the content analysis and Delphi process, and a generic overarching checklist was created.Conclusion: Using this generic checklist, it may now be possible to pool data inter-institution to perform more powerful analyses on how our students obtain, or fail to obtain competence in forceps exodontia. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/249042 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 1.7 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.633 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Durham, J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Balmer, C. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Bell, A. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cowan, G. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cowpe, J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Crean, St J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Dawson, L. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Evans, A. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Freeman, C. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Jones, J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Macluskey, M. | - |
dc.contributor.author | McDonagh, A. | - |
dc.contributor.author | McHanwell, S. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Millsopp, L. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Myrddin, L. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Oliver, R. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Renton, T. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Sivarajasingam, V. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Still, D. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Taylor, K. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Thomson, P. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-10-27T05:58:57Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-10-27T05:58:57Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | European Journal of Dental Education, 2010, v. 14, n. 4, p. 210-214 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1396-5883 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/249042 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The assessment of competence in clinical skills has become more frequent in published healthcare curricula and syllabuses recently. There are agreed mechanisms for the assessment of competence in the post-graduate environment, but no consensus within the undergraduate curriculum. This paper seeks to develop an agreed generic checklist for the assessment of competence in forceps exodontia.Materials and methods: A modified Delphi process was undertaken with representatives from all UK dental schools (n = 13) to develop a generic checklist for the assessment of competence in forceps exodontia. A content analysis of the assessments employed by each school was used to help discussion and inform the Delphi process.Results: Seven schools currently employ a summative assessment of competence in forceps exodontia, with the majority employing a structured clinical objective test (n = 6). From the seven assessments, there were a total of 29 putative items and 10 putative domains identified for a generic checklist. These were reduced to five domains and 19 items through the content analysis and Delphi process, and a generic overarching checklist was created.Conclusion: Using this generic checklist, it may now be possible to pool data inter-institution to perform more powerful analyses on how our students obtain, or fail to obtain competence in forceps exodontia. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | European Journal of Dental Education | - |
dc.subject | Extraction | - |
dc.subject | Undergraduate | - |
dc.subject | Competence | - |
dc.subject | Exodontia | - |
dc.subject | Oral surgery | - |
dc.title | A generic consensus assessment of undergraduate competence in forceps exodontia in the United Kingdom | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2009.00612.x | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 20946248 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-77958464764 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 14 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 210 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 214 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1600-0579 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000283072000003 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1396-5883 | - |