File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Internal Orientalization or Deorientalization? Disciplinary Conflicts and National Imaginations in China, 1912–1949

TitleInternal Orientalization or Deorientalization? Disciplinary Conflicts and National Imaginations in China, 1912–1949
Authors
Keywordsethnology
sociology
internal orientalization
deorientalization
Issue Date2020
PublisherSage Publications, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.sagepub.com/journal.aspx?pid=59
Citation
Modern China, 2020, v. 46 n. 4, p. 339-371 How to Cite?
AbstractEarly twentieth-century China, as with other post-imperial states, faced the challenge of creating a nation encompassing different social groups and cultures. How to identify ethnic groups living in the borderlands and generate nationwide social cohesion became a fundamental question that concerned multiple intellectual communities. This article traces the formation of two approaches to ethnicity—ethnology and sociology—at that time. These two approaches, configuring “ethnic differences” in dissimilar ways, were received differently by the public. In the end, the ethnological approach prevailed and the sociological approach was marginalized. This outcome exemplifies a possible hierarchy of knowledge, but also involves the politics of knowledge. This article shows that the disparate visions of “ethnic others” were produced by intellectuals differently positioned within the social context of post-imperial China. The positionalities of these disciplines explain much of their intellectual alignment.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/248565
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.0
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.315
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWang, L-
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-18T08:45:09Z-
dc.date.available2017-10-18T08:45:09Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationModern China, 2020, v. 46 n. 4, p. 339-371-
dc.identifier.issn0097-7004-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/248565-
dc.description.abstractEarly twentieth-century China, as with other post-imperial states, faced the challenge of creating a nation encompassing different social groups and cultures. How to identify ethnic groups living in the borderlands and generate nationwide social cohesion became a fundamental question that concerned multiple intellectual communities. This article traces the formation of two approaches to ethnicity—ethnology and sociology—at that time. These two approaches, configuring “ethnic differences” in dissimilar ways, were received differently by the public. In the end, the ethnological approach prevailed and the sociological approach was marginalized. This outcome exemplifies a possible hierarchy of knowledge, but also involves the politics of knowledge. This article shows that the disparate visions of “ethnic others” were produced by intellectuals differently positioned within the social context of post-imperial China. The positionalities of these disciplines explain much of their intellectual alignment.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherSage Publications, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.sagepub.com/journal.aspx?pid=59-
dc.relation.ispartofModern China-
dc.rightsModern China. Copyright © Sage Publications, Inc.-
dc.subjectethnology-
dc.subjectsociology-
dc.subjectinternal orientalization-
dc.subjectdeorientalization-
dc.titleInternal Orientalization or Deorientalization? Disciplinary Conflicts and National Imaginations in China, 1912–1949-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailWang, L: lipingw@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityWang, L=rp02062-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0097700419857522-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85068334095-
dc.identifier.hkuros280280-
dc.identifier.volume46-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.spage339-
dc.identifier.epage371-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000536860900001-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-
dc.identifier.issnl0097-7004-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats