File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Can China Back Down? Crisis De-escalation in the Shadow of Popular Opposition

TitleCan China Back Down? Crisis De-escalation in the Shadow of Popular Opposition
Authors
Issue Date2018
PublisherMIT Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://mitpress.mit.edu/is
Citation
International Security, 2018, v. 42 n. 3, p. 7-36 How to Cite?
AbstractMany analysts argue that public opinion creates pressure on Chinese leaders to act coercively in territorial disputes, and that it also limits their options to de-escalate once crises have broken out. Evidence suggests, however, that Chinese leaders may prefer having more flexibility rather than less in a crisis. Using original data generated by a survey experiment conducted in China in 2015, this article examines several strategies that Chinese leaders could use to reduce public pressure so as to make concessions in a crisis easier. These strategies include pledging to use economic sanctions instead of force; invoking China's “peaceful identity”; citing the costs of conflict to China's development; accepting United Nations mediation; and backing down in the face of U.S. military threats. In all cases except one, approval for the leader increases over a baseline level of support for making concessions. The exception is if the leader backs down in the face of U.S. military threats. Here, approval drops below the baseline level of support, especially for nationalists and hawks. The findings suggest that if one assumes that Chinese leaders are constrained by public opinion, a U.S. cost-imposition strategy to compel China to back down in crises may have the opposite effect—tying Chinese leaders' hands even tighter.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/246993
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.8
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.583
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorQuek, CK-
dc.contributor.authorJohnston, AI-
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-18T08:20:33Z-
dc.date.available2017-10-18T08:20:33Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Security, 2018, v. 42 n. 3, p. 7-36-
dc.identifier.issn0162-2889-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/246993-
dc.description.abstractMany analysts argue that public opinion creates pressure on Chinese leaders to act coercively in territorial disputes, and that it also limits their options to de-escalate once crises have broken out. Evidence suggests, however, that Chinese leaders may prefer having more flexibility rather than less in a crisis. Using original data generated by a survey experiment conducted in China in 2015, this article examines several strategies that Chinese leaders could use to reduce public pressure so as to make concessions in a crisis easier. These strategies include pledging to use economic sanctions instead of force; invoking China's “peaceful identity”; citing the costs of conflict to China's development; accepting United Nations mediation; and backing down in the face of U.S. military threats. In all cases except one, approval for the leader increases over a baseline level of support for making concessions. The exception is if the leader backs down in the face of U.S. military threats. Here, approval drops below the baseline level of support, especially for nationalists and hawks. The findings suggest that if one assumes that Chinese leaders are constrained by public opinion, a U.S. cost-imposition strategy to compel China to back down in crises may have the opposite effect—tying Chinese leaders' hands even tighter.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherMIT Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://mitpress.mit.edu/is-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Security-
dc.rightsInternational Security. Copyright © MIT Press.-
dc.titleCan China Back Down? Crisis De-escalation in the Shadow of Popular Opposition-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailQuek, CK: quek@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityQuek, CK=rp01797-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1162/ISEC_a_00303-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85041366492-
dc.identifier.hkuros281001-
dc.identifier.volume42-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage7-
dc.identifier.epage36-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000428124000001-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-
dc.identifier.issnl0162-2889-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats