File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Patent nasopalatine ducts: an update of the literature and a series of new cases

TitlePatent nasopalatine ducts: an update of the literature and a series of new cases
Authors
KeywordsPatent nasopalatine duct
Nasopalatine canal
Vomeronasal organ
Case report
Issue Date2018
PublisherSpringer-Verlag France.
Citation
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy: journal of clinical anatomy, 2018, v. 40 n. 2, p. 165-177 How to Cite?
AbstractPurpose The objective of this review is to present an update and summary of clinical findings of cases with a patent nasopalatine duct (NPD) reported in the literature from 1881 to 2016. Methods Previous articles and reviews about patent NPDs were studied and copies of all original publications were obtained for data verification. Furthermore, a literature search was conducted. In addition, the study sample was complemented with four cases recently seen in our institution. Results Ten out of 67 published cases were to be excluded for this analysis due to misinterpretation or misreporting in previous articles. Overall, 57 cases with NPD patency could be analyzed. Males outnumbered females in a ratio of 2:1. The mean age (when this information was available) was 34.1 ± 17.6 years (range 6–69 years). NPDs were located bilaterally (60%), unilaterally (20%) or centrally (20%). Complete or partial patency was reported in 73.9 and 26.1%, respectively. 74.1% of patients presented a variety of clinical signs and symptoms. The ability of the patient to produce a squeaky or whistling sound was the most frequent clinical finding (23.8%). Conclusions Caution must be exercised when reading review articles about NPD patency since wrong data have been copied in several subsequent publications. Since epidemiological data are missing with regard to patent NPDs, age and gender predilections are not warranted. Bilateral occurrence and full patency were prevailing features in the evaluated case reports of patent NPDs.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/246964
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.2
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.439
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorvon Arx, TH.-
dc.contributor.authorSchaffner, M.-
dc.contributor.authorBornstein, MM-
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-18T08:20:05Z-
dc.date.available2017-10-18T08:20:05Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationSurgical and Radiologic Anatomy: journal of clinical anatomy, 2018, v. 40 n. 2, p. 165-177-
dc.identifier.issn0930-1038-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/246964-
dc.description.abstractPurpose The objective of this review is to present an update and summary of clinical findings of cases with a patent nasopalatine duct (NPD) reported in the literature from 1881 to 2016. Methods Previous articles and reviews about patent NPDs were studied and copies of all original publications were obtained for data verification. Furthermore, a literature search was conducted. In addition, the study sample was complemented with four cases recently seen in our institution. Results Ten out of 67 published cases were to be excluded for this analysis due to misinterpretation or misreporting in previous articles. Overall, 57 cases with NPD patency could be analyzed. Males outnumbered females in a ratio of 2:1. The mean age (when this information was available) was 34.1 ± 17.6 years (range 6–69 years). NPDs were located bilaterally (60%), unilaterally (20%) or centrally (20%). Complete or partial patency was reported in 73.9 and 26.1%, respectively. 74.1% of patients presented a variety of clinical signs and symptoms. The ability of the patient to produce a squeaky or whistling sound was the most frequent clinical finding (23.8%). Conclusions Caution must be exercised when reading review articles about NPD patency since wrong data have been copied in several subsequent publications. Since epidemiological data are missing with regard to patent NPDs, age and gender predilections are not warranted. Bilateral occurrence and full patency were prevailing features in the evaluated case reports of patent NPDs.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherSpringer-Verlag France.-
dc.relation.ispartofSurgical and Radiologic Anatomy: journal of clinical anatomy-
dc.rightsThe final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/[insert DOI]-
dc.subjectPatent nasopalatine duct-
dc.subjectNasopalatine canal-
dc.subjectVomeronasal organ-
dc.subjectCase report-
dc.titlePatent nasopalatine ducts: an update of the literature and a series of new cases-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailBornstein, MM: bornst@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityBornstein, MM=rp02217-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00276-017-1926-8-
dc.identifier.pmid28929231-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85029598426-
dc.identifier.hkuros281717-
dc.identifier.volume40-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage165-
dc.identifier.epage177-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000426552000006-
dc.publisher.placeFrance-
dc.identifier.issnl0930-1038-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats