File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Book Chapter: Adaptive re-use: Producing neo-victorian space in Hong Kong

TitleAdaptive re-use: Producing neo-victorian space in Hong Kong
Authors
KeywordsAdaptive re-use
Hong kong
Intimacy
Public space
British colonialism
Conservation
Decolonization
Architecture
1881: heritage
Issue Date2015
Citation
Neo-Victorian Cities: Reassessing Urban Politics and Poetics, 2015, v. 4, p. 331-353 How to Cite?
Abstract© 2015 by Koninklijke Brill nv, Leiden, The Netherlands. All rights reserved. As a former British colony, Hong Kong struggles to reconcile itself to its Chinese identity. The need to manage colonial spaces that evoke 'unsafe' memories - but without demolishing examples of the territory's colonial architecture and history - has become a priority. While "adaptive re-use" projects promote conservation and preservation, an unintended and much desired side effect is decolonisation. In this essay, I claim adaptive re-use as a neo-Victorian spatial practice sought by the Hong Kong government to control and sanitise public space against the chaos and urgency of native streets in much the same way as did Hong Kong's nineteenth-century colonial administrators. This essay is a study of 1881: Heritage, the transformation of the former Marine Police Headquarters into a heritage hotel, museum and luxury shopping center. Via tourist snapshots and wedding portraits, the public's use of 1881: Heritage reclaims and transforms the space into a site of intimacy, offering a new approach to experiencing the production of Victorian space in and for the present.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/246811

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHo, Elizabeth-
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-26T04:28:03Z-
dc.date.available2017-09-26T04:28:03Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationNeo-Victorian Cities: Reassessing Urban Politics and Poetics, 2015, v. 4, p. 331-353-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/246811-
dc.description.abstract© 2015 by Koninklijke Brill nv, Leiden, The Netherlands. All rights reserved. As a former British colony, Hong Kong struggles to reconcile itself to its Chinese identity. The need to manage colonial spaces that evoke 'unsafe' memories - but without demolishing examples of the territory's colonial architecture and history - has become a priority. While "adaptive re-use" projects promote conservation and preservation, an unintended and much desired side effect is decolonisation. In this essay, I claim adaptive re-use as a neo-Victorian spatial practice sought by the Hong Kong government to control and sanitise public space against the chaos and urgency of native streets in much the same way as did Hong Kong's nineteenth-century colonial administrators. This essay is a study of 1881: Heritage, the transformation of the former Marine Police Headquarters into a heritage hotel, museum and luxury shopping center. Via tourist snapshots and wedding portraits, the public's use of 1881: Heritage reclaims and transforms the space into a site of intimacy, offering a new approach to experiencing the production of Victorian space in and for the present.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofNeo-Victorian Cities: Reassessing Urban Politics and Poetics-
dc.subjectAdaptive re-use-
dc.subjectHong kong-
dc.subjectIntimacy-
dc.subjectPublic space-
dc.subjectBritish colonialism-
dc.subjectConservation-
dc.subjectDecolonization-
dc.subjectArchitecture-
dc.subject1881: heritage-
dc.titleAdaptive re-use: Producing neo-victorian space in Hong Kong-
dc.typeBook_Chapter-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1163/9789004292338_014-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84937148211-
dc.identifier.volume4-
dc.identifier.spage331-
dc.identifier.epage353-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats