File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1111/anae.13981
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85026347799
- PMID: 28741653
- WOS: WOS:000410105000006
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: A randomised controlled trial of oral chloral hydrate vs. intranasal dexmedetomidine before computerised tomography in children
Title | A randomised controlled trial of oral chloral hydrate vs. intranasal dexmedetomidine before computerised tomography in children |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Chloral hydrate Dexmedetomidine Intranasal Paediatric Sedation Tomography |
Issue Date | 2017 |
Publisher | Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2044 |
Citation | Anaesthesia, 2017, v. 72 n. 10, p. 1191-1195 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Chloral hydrate is commonly used to sedate children for painless procedures. Children may recover more quickly after sedation with dexmedetomidine, which has a shorter half‐life. We randomly allocated 196 children to chloral hydrate syrup 50 mg.kg−1 and intranasal saline spray, or placebo syrup and intranasal dexmedetomidine spray 3 μg.kg−1, 30 min before computerised tomography studies. More children resisted or cried after drinking chloral hydrate syrup than placebo syrup, 72 of 107 (67%) vs. 42 of 87 (48%), p = 0.009, but there was no difference after intranasal saline vs. dexmedetomidine, 49 of 107 (46%) vs. 40 of 87 (46%), p = 0.98. Sedation was satisfactory in 81 of 107 (76%) children after chloral hydrate and 64 of 87 (74%) children after dexmedetomidine, p = 0.74. Of the 173 children followed up for at least 4 h after discharge, 38 of 97 (39%) had recovered normal function after chloral hydrate and 32 of 76 (42%) after dexmedetomidine, p = 0.76. Six children vomited after chloral hydrate syrup and placebo spray vs. none after placebo syrup and dexmedetomidine spray, p = 0.03. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/244805 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 7.5 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.400 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Yuen, VM | - |
dc.contributor.author | Li, BL | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cheuk, DK | - |
dc.contributor.author | Leung, MKM | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hui, TWC | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wong, IC | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lam, WW | - |
dc.contributor.author | Choi, SW | - |
dc.contributor.author | Irwin, MG | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-09-18T01:59:22Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-09-18T01:59:22Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Anaesthesia, 2017, v. 72 n. 10, p. 1191-1195 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0003-2409 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/244805 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Chloral hydrate is commonly used to sedate children for painless procedures. Children may recover more quickly after sedation with dexmedetomidine, which has a shorter half‐life. We randomly allocated 196 children to chloral hydrate syrup 50 mg.kg−1 and intranasal saline spray, or placebo syrup and intranasal dexmedetomidine spray 3 μg.kg−1, 30 min before computerised tomography studies. More children resisted or cried after drinking chloral hydrate syrup than placebo syrup, 72 of 107 (67%) vs. 42 of 87 (48%), p = 0.009, but there was no difference after intranasal saline vs. dexmedetomidine, 49 of 107 (46%) vs. 40 of 87 (46%), p = 0.98. Sedation was satisfactory in 81 of 107 (76%) children after chloral hydrate and 64 of 87 (74%) children after dexmedetomidine, p = 0.74. Of the 173 children followed up for at least 4 h after discharge, 38 of 97 (39%) had recovered normal function after chloral hydrate and 32 of 76 (42%) after dexmedetomidine, p = 0.76. Six children vomited after chloral hydrate syrup and placebo spray vs. none after placebo syrup and dexmedetomidine spray, p = 0.03. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2044 | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Anaesthesia | - |
dc.subject | Chloral hydrate | - |
dc.subject | Dexmedetomidine | - |
dc.subject | Intranasal | - |
dc.subject | Paediatric | - |
dc.subject | Sedation | - |
dc.subject | Tomography | - |
dc.title | A randomised controlled trial of oral chloral hydrate vs. intranasal dexmedetomidine before computerised tomography in children | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.email | Yuen, VM: vtang131@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Leung, MKM: meil@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Hui, TWC: huitwc@hkucc.hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Choi, SW: htswchoi@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Irwin, MG: mgirwin@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Choi, SW=rp02552 | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Irwin, MG=rp00390 | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_OA_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/anae.13981 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 28741653 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85026347799 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 278255 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 72 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 10 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 1191 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 1195 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000410105000006 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0003-2409 | - |