File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1111/raju.12087
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-84938942502
- Find via
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Authority, Nationality, and Minorities
Title | Authority, Nationality, and Minorities |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2015 |
Citation | Ratio Juris, 2015, v. 28, n. 3, p. 354-371 How to Cite? |
Abstract | © 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Prominent normative theories for accommodating minority national groups appeal to the value of national cultures and/or the psychology of group recognition. This article aims to show that an argument from political authority provides a better justification. Building on Joseph Raz's theory of authority, the article argues that members of minority national groups are disadvantaged in relation to their majority counterparts under standard democratic institutions; such institutions do not provide minority national groups with comparable access to the conditions for legitimate political authority. Constitutional arrangements for accommodating minority national groups-such as territorial self-government or power-sharing-are justified insofar as they might offset this disadvantage. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/244198 |
ISSN | 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.201 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Schwartz, Alex | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-08-31T08:56:19Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-08-31T08:56:19Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Ratio Juris, 2015, v. 28, n. 3, p. 354-371 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0952-1917 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/244198 | - |
dc.description.abstract | © 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Prominent normative theories for accommodating minority national groups appeal to the value of national cultures and/or the psychology of group recognition. This article aims to show that an argument from political authority provides a better justification. Building on Joseph Raz's theory of authority, the article argues that members of minority national groups are disadvantaged in relation to their majority counterparts under standard democratic institutions; such institutions do not provide minority national groups with comparable access to the conditions for legitimate political authority. Constitutional arrangements for accommodating minority national groups-such as territorial self-government or power-sharing-are justified insofar as they might offset this disadvantage. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Ratio Juris | - |
dc.title | Authority, Nationality, and Minorities | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/raju.12087 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-84938942502 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 281759 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 28 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 354 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 371 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1467-9337 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0952-1917 | - |