File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.07.214
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-77957318144
- PMID: 20875522
- WOS: WOS:000282720300019
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Immediate effects of 2 different whole-body vibration frequencies on muscle peak torque and stiffness
Title | Immediate effects of 2 different whole-body vibration frequencies on muscle peak torque and stiffness |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Muscle strength Muscle, skeletal Rehabilitation |
Issue Date | 2010 |
Citation | Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2010, v. 91, n. 10, p. 1608-1615 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Objective To examine the immediate effects of 2 vibration protocols with different vibration frequencies that yielded the same maximum acceleration (106.75ms -2 ) on muscle peak torque and stiffness of knee extensor and flexor. Design Randomized crossover study with repeated measures. Setting Laboratory setting. Participants Recreationally active male adults (N=10). Intervention Participants performed 10 bouts of 60-second static half squats intermitted with a 60-second rest period between bouts on a platform with no vibration (control) and a vibration frequency of 26Hz or 40Hz. Main Outcome Measures Concentric and eccentric peak torques of knee extensor and flexor were examined within 5 minutes before and after vibration by isokinetic test. Young's modulus as an index of tissue stiffness was determined at quadriceps and hamstring pre- and postvibration by using an ultrasound indentation method. Results The 2-way repeated-measures analysis of variance indicated a significant interaction effect between vibration and vibration frequency for knee extensor concentric peak torque (P=.003). The vibration-induced changes of knee extensor concentric peak torque in vibration frequency of 26Hz (14.5Nm) and 40Hz (12.0Nm) were found to be significantly greater than that in controls (-29.4Nm) (P < .05). The change in eccentric peak torque of knee flexor after vibration tended to be greater in 26Hz of vibration frequency when compared with controls (26Hz of vibration frequency vs controls: 13.9±7.1 vs -11.4±5.3Nm, P=.08). No statistically significant differences were obtained in tissue stiffness in the quadriceps and hamstring with any of the conditions. Conclusions Our data suggest that whole-body vibration at a frequency of 26Hz and 40Hz preclude the decline in concentric peak torque of knee extensor observed after 10 bouts of 60 seconds of static half squats. A change in muscle mechanical stiffness property as induced by whole-body vibration is not supported by our data. © 2010 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/244108 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 3.6 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.091 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Siu, Parco M. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Tam, Bjorn T. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chow, Daniel H. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Guo, Jing Yi | - |
dc.contributor.author | Huang, Yan Ping | - |
dc.contributor.author | Zheng, Yong Ping | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wong, Stephen H. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-08-31T08:56:04Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-08-31T08:56:04Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2010, v. 91, n. 10, p. 1608-1615 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0003-9993 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/244108 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objective To examine the immediate effects of 2 vibration protocols with different vibration frequencies that yielded the same maximum acceleration (106.75ms -2 ) on muscle peak torque and stiffness of knee extensor and flexor. Design Randomized crossover study with repeated measures. Setting Laboratory setting. Participants Recreationally active male adults (N=10). Intervention Participants performed 10 bouts of 60-second static half squats intermitted with a 60-second rest period between bouts on a platform with no vibration (control) and a vibration frequency of 26Hz or 40Hz. Main Outcome Measures Concentric and eccentric peak torques of knee extensor and flexor were examined within 5 minutes before and after vibration by isokinetic test. Young's modulus as an index of tissue stiffness was determined at quadriceps and hamstring pre- and postvibration by using an ultrasound indentation method. Results The 2-way repeated-measures analysis of variance indicated a significant interaction effect between vibration and vibration frequency for knee extensor concentric peak torque (P=.003). The vibration-induced changes of knee extensor concentric peak torque in vibration frequency of 26Hz (14.5Nm) and 40Hz (12.0Nm) were found to be significantly greater than that in controls (-29.4Nm) (P < .05). The change in eccentric peak torque of knee flexor after vibration tended to be greater in 26Hz of vibration frequency when compared with controls (26Hz of vibration frequency vs controls: 13.9±7.1 vs -11.4±5.3Nm, P=.08). No statistically significant differences were obtained in tissue stiffness in the quadriceps and hamstring with any of the conditions. Conclusions Our data suggest that whole-body vibration at a frequency of 26Hz and 40Hz preclude the decline in concentric peak torque of knee extensor observed after 10 bouts of 60 seconds of static half squats. A change in muscle mechanical stiffness property as induced by whole-body vibration is not supported by our data. © 2010 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation | - |
dc.subject | Muscle strength | - |
dc.subject | Muscle, skeletal | - |
dc.subject | Rehabilitation | - |
dc.title | Immediate effects of 2 different whole-body vibration frequencies on muscle peak torque and stiffness | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.07.214 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 20875522 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-77957318144 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 91 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 10 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 1608 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 1615 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000282720300019 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0003-9993 | - |