File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
  • Find via Find It@HKUL
Supplementary

Article: The Corporate Veil Doctrine Revisited: A Comparative Study of the English and the U.S. Corporate Veil Doctrines

TitleThe Corporate Veil Doctrine Revisited: A Comparative Study of the English and the U.S. Corporate Veil Doctrines
Authors
Issue Date2011
PublisherBoston College, School of Law. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/iclr/
Citation
Boston College International and Comparative Law Review, 2011, v. 34 n. 2, p. 329-412 How to Cite?
AbstractThis Article undertakes a comparative study of corporate veil piercing doctrines under U.S. corporation and English company law. The Article highlights some fundamental differences between the doctrines in terms of jurisprudential approaches, treatment of specific case types, and other related issues. The Article demonstrates that despite these substantial differences, many English corporate veil cases in fact share a similar analytical approach to the instrumentality doctrine under U.S. law. Therefore, it is possible to construct an English instrumentality doctrine that will bring structure and clarity to the English corporate veil doctrine. The Article concludes with a revival of the much-maligned single economic unit theory, first propounded by Lord Denning. This reformulated theory will provide a more systematic approach to veil piercing cases involving corporate groups.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/243115
ISSN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCheng, TKH-
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-25T02:50:14Z-
dc.date.available2017-08-25T02:50:14Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citationBoston College International and Comparative Law Review, 2011, v. 34 n. 2, p. 329-412-
dc.identifier.issn0277-5778-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/243115-
dc.description.abstractThis Article undertakes a comparative study of corporate veil piercing doctrines under U.S. corporation and English company law. The Article highlights some fundamental differences between the doctrines in terms of jurisprudential approaches, treatment of specific case types, and other related issues. The Article demonstrates that despite these substantial differences, many English corporate veil cases in fact share a similar analytical approach to the instrumentality doctrine under U.S. law. Therefore, it is possible to construct an English instrumentality doctrine that will bring structure and clarity to the English corporate veil doctrine. The Article concludes with a revival of the much-maligned single economic unit theory, first propounded by Lord Denning. This reformulated theory will provide a more systematic approach to veil piercing cases involving corporate groups.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherBoston College, School of Law. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/iclr/-
dc.relation.ispartofBoston College International and Comparative Law Review-
dc.titleThe Corporate Veil Doctrine Revisited: A Comparative Study of the English and the U.S. Corporate Veil Doctrines-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailCheng, TKH: tkhcheng@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityCheng, TKH=rp01242-
dc.description.naturelink_to_OA_fulltext-
dc.identifier.hkuros275567-
dc.identifier.hkuros183921-
dc.identifier.volume34-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage329-
dc.identifier.epage412-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-
dc.identifier.issnl0277-5778-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats