File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Capital budgeting and compensation with asymmetric information and moral hazard

TitleCapital budgeting and compensation with asymmetric information and moral hazard
Authors
KeywordsCapital budgeting
Moral hazard
Mechanism design
Investment policy
G31
D82
Compensation
Asymmetric information
Issue Date2001
Citation
Journal of Financial Economics, 2001, v. 61, n. 3, p. 311-344 How to Cite?
AbstractWe consider optimal capital allocation and managerial compensation mechanisms for decentralized firms when division managers have an incentive to misrepresent project quality and to minimize privately costly but value-enhancing effort. We show that in the optimal mechanism firms always underinvest in capital relative to a naive application of the net present value (NPV) rule. We make a number of novel cross-sectional predictions about the severity of the underinvestment problem and the composition of managerial compensation contracts. We also find that firms will optimally give greater performance-based pay (at the expense of fixed wages) to managers of higher quality projects to mitigate the incentive for managers to overstate project quality. Managers may thus receive greater performance-based pay because they manage higher quality projects, not that greater performance-based pay causes firm value to increase. © 2001 Elsevier Science S.A.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/241881
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 10.4
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 13.655
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBernardo, Antonio E.-
dc.contributor.authorCai, Hongbin-
dc.contributor.authorLuo, Jiang-
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-23T01:55:59Z-
dc.date.available2017-06-23T01:55:59Z-
dc.date.issued2001-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Financial Economics, 2001, v. 61, n. 3, p. 311-344-
dc.identifier.issn0304-405X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/241881-
dc.description.abstractWe consider optimal capital allocation and managerial compensation mechanisms for decentralized firms when division managers have an incentive to misrepresent project quality and to minimize privately costly but value-enhancing effort. We show that in the optimal mechanism firms always underinvest in capital relative to a naive application of the net present value (NPV) rule. We make a number of novel cross-sectional predictions about the severity of the underinvestment problem and the composition of managerial compensation contracts. We also find that firms will optimally give greater performance-based pay (at the expense of fixed wages) to managers of higher quality projects to mitigate the incentive for managers to overstate project quality. Managers may thus receive greater performance-based pay because they manage higher quality projects, not that greater performance-based pay causes firm value to increase. © 2001 Elsevier Science S.A.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Financial Economics-
dc.subjectCapital budgeting-
dc.subjectMoral hazard-
dc.subjectMechanism design-
dc.subjectInvestment policy-
dc.subjectG31-
dc.subjectD82-
dc.subjectCompensation-
dc.subjectAsymmetric information-
dc.titleCapital budgeting and compensation with asymmetric information and moral hazard-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S0304-405X(01)00065-4-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0000713363-
dc.identifier.volume61-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage311-
dc.identifier.epage344-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000170259300002-
dc.identifier.issnl0304-405X-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats