File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2011.02315.x
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-84859049962
- PMID: 22443245
- WOS: WOS:000302016200008
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Validation of apathy evaluation scale and assessment of severity of apathy in Alzheimer's disease
Title | Validation of apathy evaluation scale and assessment of severity of apathy in Alzheimer's disease |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | apathy evaluation scale apathy family distress validation reliability |
Issue Date | 2012 |
Citation | Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 2012, v. 66, n. 3, p. 227-234 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Aim: Apathy is a well-recognized symptom of Alzheimer's disease (AD). The aim of the present study was to validate the Taiwanese version of the Apathy Evaluation Scale, clinician version (AES-C) and assess the severity of apathy in patients with AD. Methods: Comprehensive evaluations were conducted in a total of 144 AD patients. This study used a cross-sectional comparative design. Data were collected from clinical interviews using the AES, the Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE), the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), and the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR). Results: Internal consistency was indicated by Cronbach's alphas of 0.85; test-retest reliability was 0.89 over a period of 3 days. Criterion-related validity was supported by the fact that AES-C significantly correlated with the apathy scores of the NPI. Factor analysis indicated a three-factor structure. Convergent validity was supported by a positive correlation between the AES-C score and the anxiety score of the NPI. Discriminant validity was supported by the fact that the AES-C scores did not correlate with the depression subscale of the NPI, and the correlation between the AES-C score and the euphoria score of the NPI score was negative. Known-group validity was supported by results showing that AD patients in a moderate stage of dementia (CDR = 2) had significantly higher scores on the AES-C than patients with mild-stage dementia (CDR = 1). Conclusion: The AES-C is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring symptoms of apathy among AD patients in Taiwan. © 2012 Japanese Society of Psychiatry and Neurology. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/241233 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 5.0 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.250 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Hsieh, Chia Jung | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chu, Hsin | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cheng, Joseph Jror Serk | - |
dc.contributor.author | Shen, Winston W. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lin, Chia Chin | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-05-26T03:37:10Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-05-26T03:37:10Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 2012, v. 66, n. 3, p. 227-234 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1323-1316 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/241233 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Aim: Apathy is a well-recognized symptom of Alzheimer's disease (AD). The aim of the present study was to validate the Taiwanese version of the Apathy Evaluation Scale, clinician version (AES-C) and assess the severity of apathy in patients with AD. Methods: Comprehensive evaluations were conducted in a total of 144 AD patients. This study used a cross-sectional comparative design. Data were collected from clinical interviews using the AES, the Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE), the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), and the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR). Results: Internal consistency was indicated by Cronbach's alphas of 0.85; test-retest reliability was 0.89 over a period of 3 days. Criterion-related validity was supported by the fact that AES-C significantly correlated with the apathy scores of the NPI. Factor analysis indicated a three-factor structure. Convergent validity was supported by a positive correlation between the AES-C score and the anxiety score of the NPI. Discriminant validity was supported by the fact that the AES-C scores did not correlate with the depression subscale of the NPI, and the correlation between the AES-C score and the euphoria score of the NPI score was negative. Known-group validity was supported by results showing that AD patients in a moderate stage of dementia (CDR = 2) had significantly higher scores on the AES-C than patients with mild-stage dementia (CDR = 1). Conclusion: The AES-C is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring symptoms of apathy among AD patients in Taiwan. © 2012 Japanese Society of Psychiatry and Neurology. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences | - |
dc.subject | apathy evaluation scale | - |
dc.subject | apathy | - |
dc.subject | family distress | - |
dc.subject | validation | - |
dc.subject | reliability | - |
dc.title | Validation of apathy evaluation scale and assessment of severity of apathy in Alzheimer's disease | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_OA_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2011.02315.x | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 22443245 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-84859049962 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 66 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 227 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 234 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1440-1819 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000302016200008 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1323-1316 | - |