File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Psychometric testing of the Impact of Event Scale-Chinese Version (IES-C) in oral cancer patients in Taiwan

TitlePsychometric testing of the Impact of Event Scale-Chinese Version (IES-C) in oral cancer patients in Taiwan
Authors
KeywordsReliability
Validity
Avoidance
Impact of Event Scale
Intrusion
Oral cancer
Psychometrics
Issue Date2005
Citation
Supportive Care in Cancer, 2005, v. 13, n. 7, p. 485-492 How to Cite?
AbstractGoals of work: No culturally relevant instrument exists to assess the impact of cancer on patients in Taiwan. Therefore, this two-phase study was undertaken to (1) develop a Chinese version of the Impact of Event Scale (IES), (2) examine its psychometric properties, and (3) use the IES-Chinese version (IES-C) to assess the impact of cancer in newly diagnosed oral cancer patients in Taiwan. Patients and methods: The psychometric properties of the 15-item IES-C were tested in 106 newly diagnosed oral cancer patients and analyzed by descriptive statistics, test-retest reliability, Pearson's correlation, and principal component analysis. Main results: The results showed that (1) the IES-C has satisfactory content validity and feasibility; (2) overall internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) was 0.91 with values of 0.91 and 0.81 for intrusion and avoidance, respectively; (3) overall test-retest reliability (3-day interval) was 0.97; (4) two clearly identified factors explained 55.97% of the variance; (5) satisfactory construct validity was supported by both factor analysis and theoretically supported correlation analysis (significant correlations between the total IES-C and its subscales as well as anxiety and depression); and (6) oral cancer patients had relatively higher IES-C scores than previously reported. Conclusions: These results support the IES-C as an instrument with satisfactory psychometric properties and ease of use in clinical settings. They also suggest that more attention should be paid to the impact on patients of a new diagnosis of oral cancer. Further testing of the IES-C in different cancer populations is suggested to validate its psychometric properties. © Springer-Verlag 2005.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/241135
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.8
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.007
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChen, Shu Ching-
dc.contributor.authorLai, Yeur Hur-
dc.contributor.authorLiao, Chun Ta-
dc.contributor.authorLin, Chia Chin-
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-26T03:36:54Z-
dc.date.available2017-05-26T03:36:54Z-
dc.date.issued2005-
dc.identifier.citationSupportive Care in Cancer, 2005, v. 13, n. 7, p. 485-492-
dc.identifier.issn0941-4355-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/241135-
dc.description.abstractGoals of work: No culturally relevant instrument exists to assess the impact of cancer on patients in Taiwan. Therefore, this two-phase study was undertaken to (1) develop a Chinese version of the Impact of Event Scale (IES), (2) examine its psychometric properties, and (3) use the IES-Chinese version (IES-C) to assess the impact of cancer in newly diagnosed oral cancer patients in Taiwan. Patients and methods: The psychometric properties of the 15-item IES-C were tested in 106 newly diagnosed oral cancer patients and analyzed by descriptive statistics, test-retest reliability, Pearson's correlation, and principal component analysis. Main results: The results showed that (1) the IES-C has satisfactory content validity and feasibility; (2) overall internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) was 0.91 with values of 0.91 and 0.81 for intrusion and avoidance, respectively; (3) overall test-retest reliability (3-day interval) was 0.97; (4) two clearly identified factors explained 55.97% of the variance; (5) satisfactory construct validity was supported by both factor analysis and theoretically supported correlation analysis (significant correlations between the total IES-C and its subscales as well as anxiety and depression); and (6) oral cancer patients had relatively higher IES-C scores than previously reported. Conclusions: These results support the IES-C as an instrument with satisfactory psychometric properties and ease of use in clinical settings. They also suggest that more attention should be paid to the impact on patients of a new diagnosis of oral cancer. Further testing of the IES-C in different cancer populations is suggested to validate its psychometric properties. © Springer-Verlag 2005.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofSupportive Care in Cancer-
dc.subjectReliability-
dc.subjectValidity-
dc.subjectAvoidance-
dc.subjectImpact of Event Scale-
dc.subjectIntrusion-
dc.subjectOral cancer-
dc.subjectPsychometrics-
dc.titlePsychometric testing of the Impact of Event Scale-Chinese Version (IES-C) in oral cancer patients in Taiwan-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00520-005-0775-x-
dc.identifier.pmid15717159-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-21644455005-
dc.identifier.volume13-
dc.identifier.issue7-
dc.identifier.spage485-
dc.identifier.epage492-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000230176100001-
dc.identifier.issnl0941-4355-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats