File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1007/s11214-012-9916-y
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-84866742240
- WOS: WOS:000308952500017
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Selection of the Mars Science Laboratory landing site
Title | Selection of the Mars Science Laboratory landing site |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Surface materials Mars Science Laboratory Surface characteristics Landing sites Mars |
Issue Date | 2012 |
Citation | Space Science Reviews, 2012, v. 170, n. 1-4, p. 641-737 How to Cite? |
Abstract | The selection of Gale crater as the Mars Science Laboratory landing site took over five years, involved broad participation of the science community via five open workshops, and narrowed an initial >50 sites (25 by 20 km) to four finalists (Eberswalde, Gale, Holden and Mawrth) based on science and safety. Engineering constraints important to the selection included: (1) latitude (±30°) for thermal management of the rover and instruments, (2) elevation (<-1 km) for sufficient atmosphere to slow the spacecraft, (3) relief of <100-130 m at baselines of 1-1000 m for control authority and sufficient fuel during powered descent, (4) slopes of <30° at baselines of 2-5 m for rover stability at touchdown, (5) moderate rock abundance to avoid impacting the belly pan during touchdown, and (6) a radar-reflective, load-bearing, and trafficable surface that is safe for landing and roving and not dominated by fine-grained dust. Science criteria important for the selection include the ability to assess past habitable environments, which include diversity, context, and biosignature (including organics) preservation. Sites were evaluated in detail using targeted data from instruments on all active orbiters, and especially Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter. All of the final four sites have layered sedimentary rocks with spectral evidence for phyllosilicates that clearly address the science objectives of the mission. Sophisticated entry, descent and landing simulations that include detailed information on all of the engineering constraints indicate all of the final four sites are safe for landing. Evaluation of the traversabilty of the landing sites and target go to areas outside of the ellipse using slope and material properties information indicates that all are trafficable and go to sites can be accessed within the lifetime of the mission. In the final selection, Gale crater was favored over Eberswalde based on its greater diversity and potential habitability. © 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/236658 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 9.1 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.485 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Golombek, M. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Grant, J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kipp, D. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Vasavada, A. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kirk, R. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Fergason, R. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Bellutta, P. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Calef, F. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Larsen, K. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Katayama, Y. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Huertas, A. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Beyer, R. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chen, A. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Parker, T. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Pollard, B. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, S. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Sun, Y. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hoover, R. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Sladek, H. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Grotzinger, J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Welch, R. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Noe Dobrea, E. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Michalski, J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Watkins, M. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-12-01T09:08:31Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-12-01T09:08:31Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Space Science Reviews, 2012, v. 170, n. 1-4, p. 641-737 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0038-6308 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/236658 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The selection of Gale crater as the Mars Science Laboratory landing site took over five years, involved broad participation of the science community via five open workshops, and narrowed an initial >50 sites (25 by 20 km) to four finalists (Eberswalde, Gale, Holden and Mawrth) based on science and safety. Engineering constraints important to the selection included: (1) latitude (±30°) for thermal management of the rover and instruments, (2) elevation (<-1 km) for sufficient atmosphere to slow the spacecraft, (3) relief of <100-130 m at baselines of 1-1000 m for control authority and sufficient fuel during powered descent, (4) slopes of <30° at baselines of 2-5 m for rover stability at touchdown, (5) moderate rock abundance to avoid impacting the belly pan during touchdown, and (6) a radar-reflective, load-bearing, and trafficable surface that is safe for landing and roving and not dominated by fine-grained dust. Science criteria important for the selection include the ability to assess past habitable environments, which include diversity, context, and biosignature (including organics) preservation. Sites were evaluated in detail using targeted data from instruments on all active orbiters, and especially Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter. All of the final four sites have layered sedimentary rocks with spectral evidence for phyllosilicates that clearly address the science objectives of the mission. Sophisticated entry, descent and landing simulations that include detailed information on all of the engineering constraints indicate all of the final four sites are safe for landing. Evaluation of the traversabilty of the landing sites and target go to areas outside of the ellipse using slope and material properties information indicates that all are trafficable and go to sites can be accessed within the lifetime of the mission. In the final selection, Gale crater was favored over Eberswalde based on its greater diversity and potential habitability. © 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Space Science Reviews | - |
dc.subject | Surface materials | - |
dc.subject | Mars Science Laboratory | - |
dc.subject | Surface characteristics | - |
dc.subject | Landing sites | - |
dc.subject | Mars | - |
dc.title | Selection of the Mars Science Laboratory landing site | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s11214-012-9916-y | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-84866742240 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 170 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 1-4 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 641 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 737 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1572-9672 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000308952500017 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0038-6308 | - |