File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Efficacy of topical tacrolimus for oral lichen planus: Real-life experience in a retrospective cohort of patients with a review of the literature

TitleEfficacy of topical tacrolimus for oral lichen planus: Real-life experience in a retrospective cohort of patients with a review of the literature
Authors
Issue Date2015
Citation
Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 2015, v. 29, n. 6, p. 1107-1113 How to Cite?
Abstract© 2014 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.Background and Objective Management of oral lichen planus (OLP) is challenging and therapeutic options are limited. The use of topical tacrolimus has shown promising results. We reviewed our daily life experience with topical tacrolimus in OLP patients. Methods This retrospective unicentre study included all 21 patients with OLP, which were evaluated over a 53-month period and treated with topical tacrolimus. Patients were initially given a topical preparation of 0.1% tacrolimus twice daily. The response to treatment was assessed using a 4-point scale at month 2 and 6: complete response of affected area (CR), major remission (>50%, MR), partial remission (25-50%, PR) and either no response (<25%) or worsening. The pain score was also assessed using a 3-point scale. Results Four of 21 patients (19%) showed a CR at month 2, whereas at month 6, 7 (33%) had a CR. For patients who reported MR (n = 2) and PR (n = 8) at month 2, the therapy was continued. Of those, at 6 months, three patients showed a CR, while four maintained a PR. The pain score improved during treatment. After 2 months of therapy, eight of 10 patients with an initial high pain score achieved a significant improvement. In patients starting with moderate pain an improvement was observed in one of seven patients. Overall, for three patients there was a complete loss of pain, while in nine there was a reduction. Except for transitory burning sensation and altered taste sensation, no relevant side-effects were reported. Conclusion This retrospective analysis confirms that topical tacrolimus is a valuable therapeutic option in severe or treatment-resistant OLP. Our findings in daily practice suggested nevertheless that the efficacy of topical tacrolimus is overestimated with regard to both complete response and pain reduction.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/236243
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 8.4
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.686
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRibero, S.-
dc.contributor.authorStieger, M.-
dc.contributor.authorQuaglino, P.-
dc.contributor.authorHongang, T.-
dc.contributor.authorBornstein, M. M.-
dc.contributor.authorNaldi, L.-
dc.contributor.authorBorradori, L.-
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-11T07:43:19Z-
dc.date.available2016-11-11T07:43:19Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 2015, v. 29, n. 6, p. 1107-1113-
dc.identifier.issn0926-9959-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/236243-
dc.description.abstract© 2014 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.Background and Objective Management of oral lichen planus (OLP) is challenging and therapeutic options are limited. The use of topical tacrolimus has shown promising results. We reviewed our daily life experience with topical tacrolimus in OLP patients. Methods This retrospective unicentre study included all 21 patients with OLP, which were evaluated over a 53-month period and treated with topical tacrolimus. Patients were initially given a topical preparation of 0.1% tacrolimus twice daily. The response to treatment was assessed using a 4-point scale at month 2 and 6: complete response of affected area (CR), major remission (>50%, MR), partial remission (25-50%, PR) and either no response (<25%) or worsening. The pain score was also assessed using a 3-point scale. Results Four of 21 patients (19%) showed a CR at month 2, whereas at month 6, 7 (33%) had a CR. For patients who reported MR (n = 2) and PR (n = 8) at month 2, the therapy was continued. Of those, at 6 months, three patients showed a CR, while four maintained a PR. The pain score improved during treatment. After 2 months of therapy, eight of 10 patients with an initial high pain score achieved a significant improvement. In patients starting with moderate pain an improvement was observed in one of seven patients. Overall, for three patients there was a complete loss of pain, while in nine there was a reduction. Except for transitory burning sensation and altered taste sensation, no relevant side-effects were reported. Conclusion This retrospective analysis confirms that topical tacrolimus is a valuable therapeutic option in severe or treatment-resistant OLP. Our findings in daily practice suggested nevertheless that the efficacy of topical tacrolimus is overestimated with regard to both complete response and pain reduction.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology-
dc.titleEfficacy of topical tacrolimus for oral lichen planus: Real-life experience in a retrospective cohort of patients with a review of the literature-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jdv.12758-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84929616766-
dc.identifier.volume29-
dc.identifier.issue6-
dc.identifier.spage1107-
dc.identifier.epage1113-
dc.identifier.eissn1468-3083-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000355129600009-
dc.identifier.issnl0926-9959-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats