File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Perforation of the sinus membrane during sinus floor elevation: a retrospective study of frequency and possible risk factors.

TitlePerforation of the sinus membrane during sinus floor elevation: a retrospective study of frequency and possible risk factors.
Authors
KeywordsRadiographic analysis
Retrospective study
Risk factors
Sinus floor elevation
Sinus membrane
Issue Date2014
Citation
The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants, 2014, v. 29, n. 3, p. 718-726 How to Cite?
AbstractTo analyze the frequency of perforation of the sinus membrane during maxillary sinus floor elevation (SFE) and to assess possible risk factors. Seventy-seven cases of SFE performed with a lateral window approach were evaluated retrospectively. Clinical and radiographic variables potentially influencing the risk of sinus membrane perforation were evaluated and divided into patient-related factors (age, sex, smoking habit); surgery-related factors (type of surgical approach, side, units, sites, and technique of osteotomy); and maxillary sinus-related factors (presence and height of septum, height of residual ridge, thickness of lateral sinus wall, width of antrum, and thickness and status of sinus membrane). The following factors presented with at least a 10% difference in rates of perforations: smokers (46.2%) versus nonsmokers (23.4%), simultaneous (32%) versus staged (18.5%) approach, mixed premolar-molar sites (41.2%) versus premolar-only sites (16.7%) versus molar-only sites (26.2%), presence of septa (42.9%) versus no septa (23.8%), and minimum height of residual ridge ≤4 mm (34.2%) versus > 4 mm (20.5%). These same parameters, except minimum height of residual ridge, also showed an odds ratio above 2. However, none of the comparisons reached statistical significance. The present study failed to demonstrate any factor that statistically significantly increased the risk of sinus membrane perforation during SFE using the lateral window approach.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/236231

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorvon Arx, Thomas-
dc.contributor.authorFodich, Ivo-
dc.contributor.authorBornstein, Michael M.-
dc.contributor.authorJensen, Simon S.-
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-11T07:43:18Z-
dc.date.available2016-11-11T07:43:18Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationThe International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants, 2014, v. 29, n. 3, p. 718-726-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/236231-
dc.description.abstractTo analyze the frequency of perforation of the sinus membrane during maxillary sinus floor elevation (SFE) and to assess possible risk factors. Seventy-seven cases of SFE performed with a lateral window approach were evaluated retrospectively. Clinical and radiographic variables potentially influencing the risk of sinus membrane perforation were evaluated and divided into patient-related factors (age, sex, smoking habit); surgery-related factors (type of surgical approach, side, units, sites, and technique of osteotomy); and maxillary sinus-related factors (presence and height of septum, height of residual ridge, thickness of lateral sinus wall, width of antrum, and thickness and status of sinus membrane). The following factors presented with at least a 10% difference in rates of perforations: smokers (46.2%) versus nonsmokers (23.4%), simultaneous (32%) versus staged (18.5%) approach, mixed premolar-molar sites (41.2%) versus premolar-only sites (16.7%) versus molar-only sites (26.2%), presence of septa (42.9%) versus no septa (23.8%), and minimum height of residual ridge ≤4 mm (34.2%) versus > 4 mm (20.5%). These same parameters, except minimum height of residual ridge, also showed an odds ratio above 2. However, none of the comparisons reached statistical significance. The present study failed to demonstrate any factor that statistically significantly increased the risk of sinus membrane perforation during SFE using the lateral window approach.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofThe International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants-
dc.subjectRadiographic analysis-
dc.subjectRetrospective study-
dc.subjectRisk factors-
dc.subjectSinus floor elevation-
dc.subjectSinus membrane-
dc.titlePerforation of the sinus membrane during sinus floor elevation: a retrospective study of frequency and possible risk factors.-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.11607/jomi.3657-
dc.identifier.pmid24818213-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84904438117-
dc.identifier.volume29-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage718-
dc.identifier.epage726-
dc.identifier.eissn1942-4434-
dc.identifier.issnl0882-2786-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats