File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.11607/jomi.3657
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-84904438117
- PMID: 24818213
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Perforation of the sinus membrane during sinus floor elevation: a retrospective study of frequency and possible risk factors.
Title | Perforation of the sinus membrane during sinus floor elevation: a retrospective study of frequency and possible risk factors. |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Radiographic analysis Retrospective study Risk factors Sinus floor elevation Sinus membrane |
Issue Date | 2014 |
Citation | The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants, 2014, v. 29, n. 3, p. 718-726 How to Cite? |
Abstract | To analyze the frequency of perforation of the sinus membrane during maxillary sinus floor elevation (SFE) and to assess possible risk factors. Seventy-seven cases of SFE performed with a lateral window approach were evaluated retrospectively. Clinical and radiographic variables potentially influencing the risk of sinus membrane perforation were evaluated and divided into patient-related factors (age, sex, smoking habit); surgery-related factors (type of surgical approach, side, units, sites, and technique of osteotomy); and maxillary sinus-related factors (presence and height of septum, height of residual ridge, thickness of lateral sinus wall, width of antrum, and thickness and status of sinus membrane). The following factors presented with at least a 10% difference in rates of perforations: smokers (46.2%) versus nonsmokers (23.4%), simultaneous (32%) versus staged (18.5%) approach, mixed premolar-molar sites (41.2%) versus premolar-only sites (16.7%) versus molar-only sites (26.2%), presence of septa (42.9%) versus no septa (23.8%), and minimum height of residual ridge ≤4 mm (34.2%) versus > 4 mm (20.5%). These same parameters, except minimum height of residual ridge, also showed an odds ratio above 2. However, none of the comparisons reached statistical significance. The present study failed to demonstrate any factor that statistically significantly increased the risk of sinus membrane perforation during SFE using the lateral window approach. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/236231 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | von Arx, Thomas | - |
dc.contributor.author | Fodich, Ivo | - |
dc.contributor.author | Bornstein, Michael M. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Jensen, Simon S. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-11-11T07:43:18Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-11-11T07:43:18Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants, 2014, v. 29, n. 3, p. 718-726 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/236231 | - |
dc.description.abstract | To analyze the frequency of perforation of the sinus membrane during maxillary sinus floor elevation (SFE) and to assess possible risk factors. Seventy-seven cases of SFE performed with a lateral window approach were evaluated retrospectively. Clinical and radiographic variables potentially influencing the risk of sinus membrane perforation were evaluated and divided into patient-related factors (age, sex, smoking habit); surgery-related factors (type of surgical approach, side, units, sites, and technique of osteotomy); and maxillary sinus-related factors (presence and height of septum, height of residual ridge, thickness of lateral sinus wall, width of antrum, and thickness and status of sinus membrane). The following factors presented with at least a 10% difference in rates of perforations: smokers (46.2%) versus nonsmokers (23.4%), simultaneous (32%) versus staged (18.5%) approach, mixed premolar-molar sites (41.2%) versus premolar-only sites (16.7%) versus molar-only sites (26.2%), presence of septa (42.9%) versus no septa (23.8%), and minimum height of residual ridge ≤4 mm (34.2%) versus > 4 mm (20.5%). These same parameters, except minimum height of residual ridge, also showed an odds ratio above 2. However, none of the comparisons reached statistical significance. The present study failed to demonstrate any factor that statistically significantly increased the risk of sinus membrane perforation during SFE using the lateral window approach. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants | - |
dc.subject | Radiographic analysis | - |
dc.subject | Retrospective study | - |
dc.subject | Risk factors | - |
dc.subject | Sinus floor elevation | - |
dc.subject | Sinus membrane | - |
dc.title | Perforation of the sinus membrane during sinus floor elevation: a retrospective study of frequency and possible risk factors. | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.11607/jomi.3657 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 24818213 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-84904438117 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 29 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 718 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 726 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1942-4434 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0882-2786 | - |