File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Bone apposition to a titanium-zirconium alloy implant, as compared to two other titanium-containing implants

TitleBone apposition to a titanium-zirconium alloy implant, as compared to two other titanium-containing implants
Authors
KeywordsHistology
Titaniumzirconium alloy
Osseointegration
Dental implant
Histomorphometry
Issue Date2012
Citation
European Cells and Materials, 2012, v. 23, p. 273-288 How to Cite?
AbstractImplants made of commercially pure titanium (cpTi) are widely and successfully used in dentistry. For certain indications, diameter-reduced Ti alloy implants with improved mechanical strength are highly desirable. The aim was to compare the osseointegration of titanium- zirconium (TiZr) and cpTi implants with a modified sandblasted and acid-etched (SLActive) surface and with a Ti6Al4V alloy that was sand-blasted and acid-washed. Cylindrical implants with two, 0.75 mm deep, circumferential grooves were placed in the maxilla of miniature pigs and allowed to heal for 1, 2, 4 and 8 weeks. Undecalcified toluidine blue-stained ground sections were produced. Surface topography, area fraction of tissue components, and bone-to-implant contact (BIC) were determined. All materials showed significantly different surface roughness parameters. The amount of new bone within the implant grooves increased over time, without significant differences between materials. However, BIC values were significantly related to the implant material and the healing period. For TiZr and cpTi implants, the BIC increased over time, reaching values of 59.38 % and 76.15 % after 2 weeks, and 74.50 % and 84.67 % after 8 weeks, respectively. In contrast, the BIC for Ti6Al4V implants peaked with 42.29 % after 2 weeks followed by a decline to 28.60 % at 8 weeks. Significantly more surface was covered by multinucleated giant cells on Ti6Al4V implants after 4 and 8 weeks. In conclusion, TiZr and cpTi implants showed faster osseointegration than Ti6Al4V implants. Both chemistry and surface topography might have influenced the results. The use of diameter-reduced TiZr implants in more challenging clinical situations warrants further documentation in long-term clinical studies.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/236201
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.2
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.700
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSaulacic, N.-
dc.contributor.authorBosshardt, D. D.-
dc.contributor.authorBornstein, M. M.-
dc.contributor.authorBerner, S.-
dc.contributor.authorBuser, D.-
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-11T07:43:13Z-
dc.date.available2016-11-11T07:43:13Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Cells and Materials, 2012, v. 23, p. 273-288-
dc.identifier.issn1473-2262-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/236201-
dc.description.abstractImplants made of commercially pure titanium (cpTi) are widely and successfully used in dentistry. For certain indications, diameter-reduced Ti alloy implants with improved mechanical strength are highly desirable. The aim was to compare the osseointegration of titanium- zirconium (TiZr) and cpTi implants with a modified sandblasted and acid-etched (SLActive) surface and with a Ti6Al4V alloy that was sand-blasted and acid-washed. Cylindrical implants with two, 0.75 mm deep, circumferential grooves were placed in the maxilla of miniature pigs and allowed to heal for 1, 2, 4 and 8 weeks. Undecalcified toluidine blue-stained ground sections were produced. Surface topography, area fraction of tissue components, and bone-to-implant contact (BIC) were determined. All materials showed significantly different surface roughness parameters. The amount of new bone within the implant grooves increased over time, without significant differences between materials. However, BIC values were significantly related to the implant material and the healing period. For TiZr and cpTi implants, the BIC increased over time, reaching values of 59.38 % and 76.15 % after 2 weeks, and 74.50 % and 84.67 % after 8 weeks, respectively. In contrast, the BIC for Ti6Al4V implants peaked with 42.29 % after 2 weeks followed by a decline to 28.60 % at 8 weeks. Significantly more surface was covered by multinucleated giant cells on Ti6Al4V implants after 4 and 8 weeks. In conclusion, TiZr and cpTi implants showed faster osseointegration than Ti6Al4V implants. Both chemistry and surface topography might have influenced the results. The use of diameter-reduced TiZr implants in more challenging clinical situations warrants further documentation in long-term clinical studies.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Cells and Materials-
dc.subjectHistology-
dc.subjectTitaniumzirconium alloy-
dc.subjectOsseointegration-
dc.subjectDental implant-
dc.subjectHistomorphometry-
dc.titleBone apposition to a titanium-zirconium alloy implant, as compared to two other titanium-containing implants-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.22203/eCM.v023a21-
dc.identifier.pmid22492019-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84864587268-
dc.identifier.volume23-
dc.identifier.spage273-
dc.identifier.epage288-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000307554200021-
dc.identifier.issnl1473-2262-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats