File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Antibiofilm activity of three irrigation protocols activated by ultrasonic, diode laser or Er: YAG laser in vitro

TitleAntibiofilm activity of three irrigation protocols activated by ultrasonic, diode laser or Er: YAG laser in vitro
Authors
KeywordsContinuous chelation
Confocal microscopy
Biofilm
Enterococcus faecalis
Soft chelation
Sodium hypochlorite
Issue Date2015
Citation
International Endodontic Journal, 2015, v. 48, n. 6, p. 602-610 How to Cite?
Abstract© 2014 International Endodontic Journal.Aim: To investigate the impact of three irrigation protocols, activated by three different methods, on mature biofilms of Enterococcus faecalis in vitro. Methodology: Root canals in 280 single-rooted teeth were instrumented using a rotary Ni-Ti system. Biofilms of E. faecalis were generated based on a previously established protocol. Samples were randomly divided into three experimental (n = 80) and one control (n = 40) group based on the irrigation protocol employed: group 1 (NaOCl + Etidronic acid), 1 : 1 mixture of 6% NaOCl and 18% etidronic acid; group 2 (NaOCl-EDTA), 3% NaOCl followed by 17% EDTA; group 3 (NaOCl-EDTA-NaOCl), 3% NaOCl followed by 17% EDTA and a final flush of 3% NaOCl. Saline served as the control. Samples were further divided into four subgroups (n = 20) based on the activation method: subgroup A, no activation; subgroup B, ultrasonic activation; group C, diode laser; group D, Er:YAG laser. Confocal laser scanning microscopy was used to assess bacterial viability in situ. Root dentine powder was obtained for determining the colony-forming units (CFU mL-1). Data were analysed by appropriate statistical analyses with P = 0.05. Results: All experimental irrigation protocols caused complete destruction of the biofilm in the root canal lumen. Within the dentinal tubules, all groups had a significantly higher percentage of dead bacteria than the saline control (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between NaOCl + etidronic acid and NaOCl-EDTA-NaOCl (P > 0.05), whereas both groups brought about more bacterial reduction than NaOCl-EDTA (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between diode laser and Er:YAG laser in any of the groups (P > 0.05). Both diode and Er:YAG laser were more effective than ultrasonic activation and conventional syringe irrigation in reducing E. fecalis biofilms (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The use of NaOCl after or in combination with a chelator caused the greatest reduction of E. faecalis. Diode laser and Er:YAG laser activation were superior to ultrasonics in dentinal tubule disinfection.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/236059
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 5.4
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.155
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNeelakantan, P.-
dc.contributor.authorCheng, C. Q.-
dc.contributor.authorMohanraj, R.-
dc.contributor.authorSriraman, P.-
dc.contributor.authorSubbarao, C.-
dc.contributor.authorSharma, S.-
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-10T07:12:05Z-
dc.date.available2016-11-10T07:12:05Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Endodontic Journal, 2015, v. 48, n. 6, p. 602-610-
dc.identifier.issn0143-2885-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/236059-
dc.description.abstract© 2014 International Endodontic Journal.Aim: To investigate the impact of three irrigation protocols, activated by three different methods, on mature biofilms of Enterococcus faecalis in vitro. Methodology: Root canals in 280 single-rooted teeth were instrumented using a rotary Ni-Ti system. Biofilms of E. faecalis were generated based on a previously established protocol. Samples were randomly divided into three experimental (n = 80) and one control (n = 40) group based on the irrigation protocol employed: group 1 (NaOCl + Etidronic acid), 1 : 1 mixture of 6% NaOCl and 18% etidronic acid; group 2 (NaOCl-EDTA), 3% NaOCl followed by 17% EDTA; group 3 (NaOCl-EDTA-NaOCl), 3% NaOCl followed by 17% EDTA and a final flush of 3% NaOCl. Saline served as the control. Samples were further divided into four subgroups (n = 20) based on the activation method: subgroup A, no activation; subgroup B, ultrasonic activation; group C, diode laser; group D, Er:YAG laser. Confocal laser scanning microscopy was used to assess bacterial viability in situ. Root dentine powder was obtained for determining the colony-forming units (CFU mL<sup>-1</sup>). Data were analysed by appropriate statistical analyses with P = 0.05. Results: All experimental irrigation protocols caused complete destruction of the biofilm in the root canal lumen. Within the dentinal tubules, all groups had a significantly higher percentage of dead bacteria than the saline control (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between NaOCl + etidronic acid and NaOCl-EDTA-NaOCl (P > 0.05), whereas both groups brought about more bacterial reduction than NaOCl-EDTA (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between diode laser and Er:YAG laser in any of the groups (P > 0.05). Both diode and Er:YAG laser were more effective than ultrasonic activation and conventional syringe irrigation in reducing E. fecalis biofilms (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The use of NaOCl after or in combination with a chelator caused the greatest reduction of E. faecalis. Diode laser and Er:YAG laser activation were superior to ultrasonics in dentinal tubule disinfection.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Endodontic Journal-
dc.subjectContinuous chelation-
dc.subjectConfocal microscopy-
dc.subjectBiofilm-
dc.subjectEnterococcus faecalis-
dc.subjectSoft chelation-
dc.subjectSodium hypochlorite-
dc.titleAntibiofilm activity of three irrigation protocols activated by ultrasonic, diode laser or Er: YAG laser in vitro-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/iej.12354-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84929131880-
dc.identifier.volume48-
dc.identifier.issue6-
dc.identifier.spage602-
dc.identifier.epage610-
dc.identifier.eissn1365-2591-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000354294300013-
dc.identifier.issnl0143-2885-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats