File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Removal of gutta-percha/zinc-oxide-eugenol sealer or gutta-percha/epoxy resin sealer from severely curved canals: An in vitro study

TitleRemoval of gutta-percha/zinc-oxide-eugenol sealer or gutta-percha/epoxy resin sealer from severely curved canals: An in vitro study
Authors
Issue Date2011
Citation
International Journal of Dentistry, 2011 How to Cite?
AbstractThe aim of this study was to compare the cleanliness of root canal walls after retreatment using two rotary retreatment files to hand instruments in severely curved canals obturated with gutta-percha and two different sealers. Single rooted mandibular premolars (n = 90) with root curvatures were instrumented and obturated with gutta-percha and an epoxy resin (Group 1, n = 45) or zinc oxide eugenol sealer (Group 2, n = 45). Following retreatment of the specimens (n = 15 ProTaper Universal Retreatment Files (Subgroup B) or R-Endo retreatment files (Subgroup C) after 1 month, split specimens were examined under a stereomicroscope and the percentage of remaining root filling material was statistically compared using one way ANOVA with Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons (P = 0.05). The R-Endo system performed significantly better than the other two file systems (P < 0.05). None of the systems used in this study cleaned root canals thoroughly. The R-Endo system did provide cleaner walls when compared to the other instruments used. The type of root filling materials had an impact on the outcomes with all techniques. Copyright © 2011 Santhoshini Reddy et al.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/236002
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.9
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.492
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorReddy, Santhoshini-
dc.contributor.authorNeelakantan, Prasanna-
dc.contributor.authorSaghiri, Mohammad Ali-
dc.contributor.authorLotfi, Mehrdad-
dc.contributor.authorSubbarao, Chandragiri Venkata-
dc.contributor.authorGarcia-Godoy, Franklin-
dc.contributor.authorGutmann, James L.-
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-10T07:11:57Z-
dc.date.available2016-11-10T07:11:57Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Dentistry, 2011-
dc.identifier.issn1687-8728-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/236002-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to compare the cleanliness of root canal walls after retreatment using two rotary retreatment files to hand instruments in severely curved canals obturated with gutta-percha and two different sealers. Single rooted mandibular premolars (n = 90) with root curvatures were instrumented and obturated with gutta-percha and an epoxy resin (Group 1, n = 45) or zinc oxide eugenol sealer (Group 2, n = 45). Following retreatment of the specimens (n = 15 ProTaper Universal Retreatment Files (Subgroup B) or R-Endo retreatment files (Subgroup C) after 1 month, split specimens were examined under a stereomicroscope and the percentage of remaining root filling material was statistically compared using one way ANOVA with Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons (P = 0.05). The R-Endo system performed significantly better than the other two file systems (P < 0.05). None of the systems used in this study cleaned root canals thoroughly. The R-Endo system did provide cleaner walls when compared to the other instruments used. The type of root filling materials had an impact on the outcomes with all techniques. Copyright © 2011 Santhoshini Reddy et al.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Dentistry-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.titleRemoval of gutta-percha/zinc-oxide-eugenol sealer or gutta-percha/epoxy resin sealer from severely curved canals: An in vitro study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1155/2011/541831-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84855172195-
dc.identifier.spagenull-
dc.identifier.epagenull-
dc.identifier.eissn1687-8736-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000214302300023-
dc.identifier.issnl1687-8728-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats