File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Antibacterial activity of triclosan incorporated glass ionomer cements - An in vitro pilot study

TitleAntibacterial activity of triclosan incorporated glass ionomer cements - An in vitro pilot study
Authors
KeywordsTriclosan
Atraumatic restorative treatment
chlorhexidene
glass ionomer cement
antibacterial
agar diffusion
Issue Date2010
Citation
Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 2010, v. 35, n. 2, p. 157-161 How to Cite?
AbstractObjectives: The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the antibacterial activity of glass ionomer cement impregnated with different concentrations (0.5%, 1.25% and 2.5%) of a non releasing bactericide - Triclosan (TC) against two common cariogenic bacteria - Lactobacillus acidophilus and Streptococcus mutans; and to compare Triclosan incorporated GIC with chlorhexidine (CHX) incorporated GIC (2.5%) in terms of antibacterial activity. Methods: Chlorhexidine or Triclosan were added to glass ionomer cement powder to achieve 2.5% CHX - GIC (positive control - Group II), 0.5%, 1.25% and 2.5% TC-GIC (experimental groups III, IV and V respectively) formulations. Restorative glass ionomer cement (Fuji IX GC - Group I) served as negative control. The powder and liquid were mixed and inserted into the wells punched in agar plates (10mm × 4mm). The agar diffusion method was used to determine the antibacterial activity of the cements after 1, 7 and 30 days. Mean values were compared between different study groups using One-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD procedure at a significance level of 5%. Results: Triclosan incorporated GIC was more effective against L.acidophilus and S.mutans than Chlorhexidine incorporated GIC. Triclosan at a concentration of 2.5% was more effective than at lower concentrations. At all time periods studied, the maximum zone of inhibition against L.acidophilus was produced by Group V. Against S.mutans, on days 1, 7 and 30, there was no significant difference between Groups II and IV (p>0.05), while the other groups showed significant differences. Conclusion: The use of triclosan as an antibacterial additive in GIC holds promise and further clinical research is needed in this direction.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/235996
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.5
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.371
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSainulabdeen, Sajad-
dc.contributor.authorNeelakantan, Prasanna-
dc.contributor.authorRamesh, Sindhu-
dc.contributor.authorSubbarao, C. V.-
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-10T07:11:56Z-
dc.date.available2016-11-10T07:11:56Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 2010, v. 35, n. 2, p. 157-161-
dc.identifier.issn1053-4628-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/235996-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the antibacterial activity of glass ionomer cement impregnated with different concentrations (0.5%, 1.25% and 2.5%) of a non releasing bactericide - Triclosan (TC) against two common cariogenic bacteria - Lactobacillus acidophilus and Streptococcus mutans; and to compare Triclosan incorporated GIC with chlorhexidine (CHX) incorporated GIC (2.5%) in terms of antibacterial activity. Methods: Chlorhexidine or Triclosan were added to glass ionomer cement powder to achieve 2.5% CHX - GIC (positive control - Group II), 0.5%, 1.25% and 2.5% TC-GIC (experimental groups III, IV and V respectively) formulations. Restorative glass ionomer cement (Fuji IX GC - Group I) served as negative control. The powder and liquid were mixed and inserted into the wells punched in agar plates (10mm × 4mm). The agar diffusion method was used to determine the antibacterial activity of the cements after 1, 7 and 30 days. Mean values were compared between different study groups using One-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD procedure at a significance level of 5%. Results: Triclosan incorporated GIC was more effective against L.acidophilus and S.mutans than Chlorhexidine incorporated GIC. Triclosan at a concentration of 2.5% was more effective than at lower concentrations. At all time periods studied, the maximum zone of inhibition against L.acidophilus was produced by Group V. Against S.mutans, on days 1, 7 and 30, there was no significant difference between Groups II and IV (p>0.05), while the other groups showed significant differences. Conclusion: The use of triclosan as an antibacterial additive in GIC holds promise and further clinical research is needed in this direction.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry-
dc.subjectTriclosan-
dc.subjectAtraumatic restorative treatment-
dc.subjectchlorhexidene-
dc.subjectglass ionomer cement-
dc.subjectantibacterial-
dc.subjectagar diffusion-
dc.titleAntibacterial activity of triclosan incorporated glass ionomer cements - An in vitro pilot study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.17796/jcpd.35.2.96747l52725n608x-
dc.identifier.pmid21417117-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-79952930608-
dc.identifier.volume35-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage157-
dc.identifier.epage161-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000287680700006-
dc.identifier.issnl1053-4628-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats