File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.17796/jcpd.35.2.96747l52725n608x
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-79952930608
- PMID: 21417117
- WOS: WOS:000287680700006
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Antibacterial activity of triclosan incorporated glass ionomer cements - An in vitro pilot study
Title | Antibacterial activity of triclosan incorporated glass ionomer cements - An in vitro pilot study |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Triclosan Atraumatic restorative treatment chlorhexidene glass ionomer cement antibacterial agar diffusion |
Issue Date | 2010 |
Citation | Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 2010, v. 35, n. 2, p. 157-161 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Objectives: The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the antibacterial activity of glass ionomer cement impregnated with different concentrations (0.5%, 1.25% and 2.5%) of a non releasing bactericide - Triclosan (TC) against two common cariogenic bacteria - Lactobacillus acidophilus and Streptococcus mutans; and to compare Triclosan incorporated GIC with chlorhexidine (CHX) incorporated GIC (2.5%) in terms of antibacterial activity. Methods: Chlorhexidine or Triclosan were added to glass ionomer cement powder to achieve 2.5% CHX - GIC (positive control - Group II), 0.5%, 1.25% and 2.5% TC-GIC (experimental groups III, IV and V respectively) formulations. Restorative glass ionomer cement (Fuji IX GC - Group I) served as negative control. The powder and liquid were mixed and inserted into the wells punched in agar plates (10mm × 4mm). The agar diffusion method was used to determine the antibacterial activity of the cements after 1, 7 and 30 days. Mean values were compared between different study groups using One-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD procedure at a significance level of 5%. Results: Triclosan incorporated GIC was more effective against L.acidophilus and S.mutans than Chlorhexidine incorporated GIC. Triclosan at a concentration of 2.5% was more effective than at lower concentrations. At all time periods studied, the maximum zone of inhibition against L.acidophilus was produced by Group V. Against S.mutans, on days 1, 7 and 30, there was no significant difference between Groups II and IV (p>0.05), while the other groups showed significant differences. Conclusion: The use of triclosan as an antibacterial additive in GIC holds promise and further clinical research is needed in this direction. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/235996 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 1.5 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.371 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Sainulabdeen, Sajad | - |
dc.contributor.author | Neelakantan, Prasanna | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ramesh, Sindhu | - |
dc.contributor.author | Subbarao, C. V. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-11-10T07:11:56Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-11-10T07:11:56Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 2010, v. 35, n. 2, p. 157-161 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1053-4628 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/235996 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the antibacterial activity of glass ionomer cement impregnated with different concentrations (0.5%, 1.25% and 2.5%) of a non releasing bactericide - Triclosan (TC) against two common cariogenic bacteria - Lactobacillus acidophilus and Streptococcus mutans; and to compare Triclosan incorporated GIC with chlorhexidine (CHX) incorporated GIC (2.5%) in terms of antibacterial activity. Methods: Chlorhexidine or Triclosan were added to glass ionomer cement powder to achieve 2.5% CHX - GIC (positive control - Group II), 0.5%, 1.25% and 2.5% TC-GIC (experimental groups III, IV and V respectively) formulations. Restorative glass ionomer cement (Fuji IX GC - Group I) served as negative control. The powder and liquid were mixed and inserted into the wells punched in agar plates (10mm × 4mm). The agar diffusion method was used to determine the antibacterial activity of the cements after 1, 7 and 30 days. Mean values were compared between different study groups using One-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD procedure at a significance level of 5%. Results: Triclosan incorporated GIC was more effective against L.acidophilus and S.mutans than Chlorhexidine incorporated GIC. Triclosan at a concentration of 2.5% was more effective than at lower concentrations. At all time periods studied, the maximum zone of inhibition against L.acidophilus was produced by Group V. Against S.mutans, on days 1, 7 and 30, there was no significant difference between Groups II and IV (p>0.05), while the other groups showed significant differences. Conclusion: The use of triclosan as an antibacterial additive in GIC holds promise and further clinical research is needed in this direction. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry | - |
dc.subject | Triclosan | - |
dc.subject | Atraumatic restorative treatment | - |
dc.subject | chlorhexidene | - |
dc.subject | glass ionomer cement | - |
dc.subject | antibacterial | - |
dc.subject | agar diffusion | - |
dc.title | Antibacterial activity of triclosan incorporated glass ionomer cements - An in vitro pilot study | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.17796/jcpd.35.2.96747l52725n608x | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 21417117 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-79952930608 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 35 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 2 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 157 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 161 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000287680700006 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1053-4628 | - |