File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: The effect of root dentin conditioning protocols on the push-out bond strength of three calcium silicate sealers

TitleThe effect of root dentin conditioning protocols on the push-out bond strength of three calcium silicate sealers
Authors
KeywordsCeramics
Adhesion by chemical bonding
Calcium silicate
Dentine
Push-out bond strength
Root canal irrigants
Issue Date2015
Citation
International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 2015, v. 60, p. 104-108 How to Cite?
Abstract© 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.Objectives: To compare the effects of irrigation protocols on the push-out bond strength of calcium silicate materials at two different time periods (7-days and 3-months). Materials and methods: Root canals (n=300) were irrigated with one of the following (n=60): group 1 (3% NaOCl-17% EDTA); group 2 (17% EDTA-3% NaOCl); group 3 (1:1 mixture of 6% NaOCl and 18% etidronic acid); group 4 (3% NaOCl-QMix 2in1); group 5 (3% NaOCl-2% chlorhexidine). Specimens were subdivided into three subgroups (n=20): A, Endosequence BC sealer [EBC]; B, MTA Plus [MTA-P]; C, Tech Biosealer Endo [TECH]. Specimens were suspended in phosphate buffered saline [PBS] for 7 days or 3 months (n=10 per sealer). Push-out bond strength was measured and data were analyzed (P=0.05). Results: MTA-P: showed the highest bond strength at both time periods, when NaOCl+EA was used as an irrigant. This was not significantly different from the strength produced when NaOCl-QMix was used for 7 days (P>0.05). There was no significant difference between the bond strengths of the three materials when irrigated with group 1, 2 or 5 (P>0.05), but these groups showed significantly lower bond strengths than groups 3 and 4 (P<0.05). While the bond strength of EBC and MTA-P in specimens irrigated with groups 3 and 4 improved significantly with time [P<0.05], this was not true for TECH. Conclusions: Push-out bond strength of calcium silicate cements was differentially influenced by irrigation protocol and time. MTA Plus showed the highest bond strength at both time periods, when root canals were irrigated with NaOCl+EA. The bond strength of Tech Biosealer Endo did not improve with time immaterial of the irrigation protocols.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/235956
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.2
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.729
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNeelakantan, Prasanna-
dc.contributor.authorNandagopal, Mugunth-
dc.contributor.authorShemesh, Hagay-
dc.contributor.authorWesselink, Paul-
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-10T07:11:49Z-
dc.date.available2016-11-10T07:11:49Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 2015, v. 60, p. 104-108-
dc.identifier.issn0143-7496-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/235956-
dc.description.abstract© 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.Objectives: To compare the effects of irrigation protocols on the push-out bond strength of calcium silicate materials at two different time periods (7-days and 3-months). Materials and methods: Root canals (n=300) were irrigated with one of the following (n=60): group 1 (3% NaOCl-17% EDTA); group 2 (17% EDTA-3% NaOCl); group 3 (1:1 mixture of 6% NaOCl and 18% etidronic acid); group 4 (3% NaOCl-QMix 2in1); group 5 (3% NaOCl-2% chlorhexidine). Specimens were subdivided into three subgroups (n=20): A, Endosequence BC sealer [EBC]; B, MTA Plus [MTA-P]; C, Tech Biosealer Endo [TECH]. Specimens were suspended in phosphate buffered saline [PBS] for 7 days or 3 months (n=10 per sealer). Push-out bond strength was measured and data were analyzed (P=0.05). Results: MTA-P: showed the highest bond strength at both time periods, when NaOCl+EA was used as an irrigant. This was not significantly different from the strength produced when NaOCl-QMix was used for 7 days (P>0.05). There was no significant difference between the bond strengths of the three materials when irrigated with group 1, 2 or 5 (P>0.05), but these groups showed significantly lower bond strengths than groups 3 and 4 (P<0.05). While the bond strength of EBC and MTA-P in specimens irrigated with groups 3 and 4 improved significantly with time [P<0.05], this was not true for TECH. Conclusions: Push-out bond strength of calcium silicate cements was differentially influenced by irrigation protocol and time. MTA Plus showed the highest bond strength at both time periods, when root canals were irrigated with NaOCl+EA. The bond strength of Tech Biosealer Endo did not improve with time immaterial of the irrigation protocols.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives-
dc.subjectCeramics-
dc.subjectAdhesion by chemical bonding-
dc.subjectCalcium silicate-
dc.subjectDentine-
dc.subjectPush-out bond strength-
dc.subjectRoot canal irrigants-
dc.titleThe effect of root dentin conditioning protocols on the push-out bond strength of three calcium silicate sealers-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2015.04.006-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84957019325-
dc.identifier.volume60-
dc.identifier.spage104-
dc.identifier.epage108-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000357351900014-
dc.identifier.issnl0143-7496-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats