File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Doctrinal Antithesis in Anglo-American Administrative Law
Title | Doctrinal Antithesis in Anglo-American Administrative Law |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2014 |
Publisher | University of Chicago Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/SCER/home.html |
Citation | Supreme Court Economic Review, 2014, v. 22, p. 147-180 How to Cite? |
Abstract | English administrative law guards judicial supremacy over all matters of statutory interpretation, while instructing judges to refrain from scrutinizing administrators’ factual findings. By contrast, American federal courts are obliged to respect agencies’ statutory-interpretive autonomy, but take a rigorous “hard look” at substantial agency factual determinations. This Article argues that the antithetical approaches to judicial review of administrative action adopted by the apex courts of the United Kingdom and the United States can be adequately explained by the polarization of these two polities along a spectrum of effective vetogates. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/233892 |
ISSN | |
SSRN |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Ip, Eric C. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-09-29T03:15:46Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-09-29T03:15:46Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Supreme Court Economic Review, 2014, v. 22, p. 147-180 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0736-9921 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/233892 | - |
dc.description.abstract | English administrative law guards judicial supremacy over all matters of statutory interpretation, while instructing judges to refrain from scrutinizing administrators’ factual findings. By contrast, American federal courts are obliged to respect agencies’ statutory-interpretive autonomy, but take a rigorous “hard look” at substantial agency factual determinations. This Article argues that the antithetical approaches to judicial review of administrative action adopted by the apex courts of the United Kingdom and the United States can be adequately explained by the polarization of these two polities along a spectrum of effective vetogates. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | University of Chicago Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/SCER/home.html | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Supreme Court Economic Review | - |
dc.title | Doctrinal Antithesis in Anglo-American Administrative Law | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.email | Ip, Eric C.: ericcip@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Ip, Eric C.=rp02161 | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1086/682017 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 268043 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 22 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 147 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 180 | - |
dc.identifier.ssrn | 3471508 | - |
dc.identifier.hkulrp | 2019/079 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0736-9921 | - |