File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Effects of intra-operative maintenance of general anaesthesia with propofol on postoperative pain outcomes - a systematic review and meta-analysis

TitleEffects of intra-operative maintenance of general anaesthesia with propofol on postoperative pain outcomes - a systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors
KeywordsAcute postoperative pain
Analgesia
General anaesthesia
Propofol
Issue Date2016
PublisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2044
Citation
Anaesthesia, 2016, v. 71 n. 10, p. 1222-1233 How to Cite?
AbstractPropofol is used both for induction and maintenance of anaesthesia. Recent evidence shows that propofol has analgesic properties. This meta‐analysis evaluated differences in postoperative analgesia between general anaesthetic maintenance with intravenous propofol and inhalational anaesthetics. Fourteen trials met inclusion criteria and were included. Our outcomes were pain scores 2 and 24 h after surgery. No significant difference in pain scores was found at 2 h after surgery (Hedge's g (95% CI) −0.120 (−0.415–0.175) (p = 0.425). Propofol was associated with a statistically significant, albeit marginal, reduction in pain scores 24 h after surgery (Hedge's g (95% CI) −0.134 (−0.248 to −0.021) (p = 0.021). Data were insufficient to allow a meaningful analysis regarding 24‐h morphine‐equivalent consumption. Propofol was associated with reduced postoperative nausea and vomiting (relative risk (95%CI) 0.446 (0.304–0.656) (p < 0.0001). In conclusion, this meta‐analysis suggests that propofol improves postoperative analgesia compared with inhalational anaesthesia 24 h after surgery, with a lower incidence of nausea and vomiting.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/231624
ISSN
2019 Impact Factor: 5.739
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.404
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorQiu, Q-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, SW-
dc.contributor.authorWong, SSC-
dc.contributor.authorIrwin, MG-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, CW-
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-20T05:24:26Z-
dc.date.available2016-09-20T05:24:26Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationAnaesthesia, 2016, v. 71 n. 10, p. 1222-1233-
dc.identifier.issn0003-2409-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/231624-
dc.description.abstractPropofol is used both for induction and maintenance of anaesthesia. Recent evidence shows that propofol has analgesic properties. This meta‐analysis evaluated differences in postoperative analgesia between general anaesthetic maintenance with intravenous propofol and inhalational anaesthetics. Fourteen trials met inclusion criteria and were included. Our outcomes were pain scores 2 and 24 h after surgery. No significant difference in pain scores was found at 2 h after surgery (Hedge's g (95% CI) −0.120 (−0.415–0.175) (p = 0.425). Propofol was associated with a statistically significant, albeit marginal, reduction in pain scores 24 h after surgery (Hedge's g (95% CI) −0.134 (−0.248 to −0.021) (p = 0.021). Data were insufficient to allow a meaningful analysis regarding 24‐h morphine‐equivalent consumption. Propofol was associated with reduced postoperative nausea and vomiting (relative risk (95%CI) 0.446 (0.304–0.656) (p < 0.0001). In conclusion, this meta‐analysis suggests that propofol improves postoperative analgesia compared with inhalational anaesthesia 24 h after surgery, with a lower incidence of nausea and vomiting.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2044-
dc.relation.ispartofAnaesthesia-
dc.subjectAcute postoperative pain-
dc.subjectAnalgesia-
dc.subjectGeneral anaesthesia-
dc.subjectPropofol-
dc.titleEffects of intra-operative maintenance of general anaesthesia with propofol on postoperative pain outcomes - a systematic review and meta-analysis-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailChoi, SW: htswchoi@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailWong, SSC: wongstan@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailIrwin, MG: mgirwin@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailCheung, CW: cheucw@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityChoi, SW=rp02552-
dc.identifier.authorityWong, SSC=rp01789-
dc.identifier.authorityIrwin, MG=rp00390-
dc.identifier.authorityCheung, CW=rp00244-
dc.description.naturelink_to_OA_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/anae.13578-
dc.identifier.pmid27506326-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84986275167-
dc.identifier.hkuros266240-
dc.identifier.hkuros282857-
dc.identifier.volume71-
dc.identifier.issue10-
dc.identifier.spage1222-
dc.identifier.epage1233-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000384089800013-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats