File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-0035409275
- PMID: 11422589
- WOS: WOS:000169679000010
- Find via

Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Evaluation of the effect of tooth vitality on regenerative outcomes in infrabony defects
| Title | Evaluation of the effect of tooth vitality on regenerative outcomes in infrabony defects |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Keywords | Intrabony defects Tooth vitality Guided tissue regeneration Therapy |
| Issue Date | 2001 |
| Citation | Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 2001, v. 28, n. 7, p. 672-679 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | Background, aims. This investigation was designed to evaluate the null hypothesis of no differences in GTR outcomes in intrabony defects at vital and successfully root-canal-treated teeth. Method: 208 consecutive patients with one intrabony defect each were enrolled. Based on tooth vitality, the treated population was divided at baseline into 2 groups: one with 41 non-vital teeth and the other with 167 vital teeth. The 2 groups were similar in terms of patient and defect characteristics. Results: A slight unbalance in terms of depth of the intrabony component was observed in the non-vital group compared to the vital group (6.9±2.1 mm versus 6.2±2.3 mm, p=0.08). All defects were treated with GTR therapy. At 1 year, the non-vital and the vital groups showed a clinical attachment level (CAL) gain of 4.9±2.2 mm and of 4.2±2 mm, respectively. The difference was statistically significant (p=0.03). To correct for the baseline unbalance in defect depth, data were expressed as a % of clinical attachment level gains with respect to the original intrabony depth of the defect. % CAL gains were 72.8±42.2% and 73±26.4% for vital and non-vital teeth, respectively: the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.48). Average residual pocket depths were 2.8±1 mm in the vital and 2.8±0.9 mm in the non-vital group. Tooth vitality was assessed at baseline, at 1-year and at follow-up (5.4±2.8 years after surgery): all teeth vital at baseline were still vital at follow-up with the exception of 2 teeth that received endodontic treatment for reconstructive reasons and for caries. At follow-up visit, the difference in CAL with respect to 1-year measurements was -0.9±0.8 mm in the vital group and -0.7±0.8 mm in the non-vital group, indicating stability of the regenerated attachment at the majority of sites. Conclusions: Data from this study demonstrate that root canal treatment does not negatively affect the healing response of deep intrabony defects treated with GTR therapy; furthermore GTR therapy in deep intrabony defects does not negatively influence tooth vitality. © Munksgaard, 2001. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/230714 |
| ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 5.8 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.249 |
| ISI Accession Number ID |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Cortellini, Pierpaolo | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Tonetti, Maurizio S. | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2016-09-01T06:06:37Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2016-09-01T06:06:37Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2001 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 2001, v. 28, n. 7, p. 672-679 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0303-6979 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/230714 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Background, aims. This investigation was designed to evaluate the null hypothesis of no differences in GTR outcomes in intrabony defects at vital and successfully root-canal-treated teeth. Method: 208 consecutive patients with one intrabony defect each were enrolled. Based on tooth vitality, the treated population was divided at baseline into 2 groups: one with 41 non-vital teeth and the other with 167 vital teeth. The 2 groups were similar in terms of patient and defect characteristics. Results: A slight unbalance in terms of depth of the intrabony component was observed in the non-vital group compared to the vital group (6.9±2.1 mm versus 6.2±2.3 mm, p=0.08). All defects were treated with GTR therapy. At 1 year, the non-vital and the vital groups showed a clinical attachment level (CAL) gain of 4.9±2.2 mm and of 4.2±2 mm, respectively. The difference was statistically significant (p=0.03). To correct for the baseline unbalance in defect depth, data were expressed as a % of clinical attachment level gains with respect to the original intrabony depth of the defect. % CAL gains were 72.8±42.2% and 73±26.4% for vital and non-vital teeth, respectively: the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.48). Average residual pocket depths were 2.8±1 mm in the vital and 2.8±0.9 mm in the non-vital group. Tooth vitality was assessed at baseline, at 1-year and at follow-up (5.4±2.8 years after surgery): all teeth vital at baseline were still vital at follow-up with the exception of 2 teeth that received endodontic treatment for reconstructive reasons and for caries. At follow-up visit, the difference in CAL with respect to 1-year measurements was -0.9±0.8 mm in the vital group and -0.7±0.8 mm in the non-vital group, indicating stability of the regenerated attachment at the majority of sites. Conclusions: Data from this study demonstrate that root canal treatment does not negatively affect the healing response of deep intrabony defects treated with GTR therapy; furthermore GTR therapy in deep intrabony defects does not negatively influence tooth vitality. © Munksgaard, 2001. | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Clinical Periodontology | - |
| dc.subject | Intrabony defects | - |
| dc.subject | Tooth vitality | - |
| dc.subject | Guided tissue regeneration | - |
| dc.subject | Therapy | - |
| dc.title | Evaluation of the effect of tooth vitality on regenerative outcomes in infrabony defects | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 11422589 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-0035409275 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 28 | - |
| dc.identifier.issue | 7 | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | 672 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | 679 | - |
| dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000169679000010 | - |
| dc.identifier.issnl | 0303-6979 | - |
