File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Conference Paper: Law and Religious Market Theory

TitleLaw and Religious Market Theory
Authors
Issue Date2015
Citation
The 3rd HKU-UNSW Research Symposium, The University of New South Wales (UNSW), Australia, 3-4 December 2015. How to Cite?
AbstractThis Article presents Law & Religious Market as an alternative critical perspective to examine the normative considerations that are associated with laws/policies affecting religion. The current legal discourse on religious liberty posits the proper role of the law and other state instruments in relation to religious matters as a neutral arbitrator that avoids making normative claims as to the merits or shortcomings of any particular religion. Law & Religious Market, in contrast, recognizes that even without any explicit endorsement or suppression of particular religions, laws/policies will still profoundly affect the prevalence of a religion through the ability of laws/policies to shape the contours of religious competition. Thus, legal discourse cannot hide behind a veil of religious neutrality and must confront the conversation as to what sort of religious competition – and consequent winner in the religious market – should be fostered by laws/policies.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/227625

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChen, J-
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-18T09:11:52Z-
dc.date.available2016-07-18T09:11:52Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationThe 3rd HKU-UNSW Research Symposium, The University of New South Wales (UNSW), Australia, 3-4 December 2015.-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/227625-
dc.description.abstractThis Article presents Law & Religious Market as an alternative critical perspective to examine the normative considerations that are associated with laws/policies affecting religion. The current legal discourse on religious liberty posits the proper role of the law and other state instruments in relation to religious matters as a neutral arbitrator that avoids making normative claims as to the merits or shortcomings of any particular religion. Law & Religious Market, in contrast, recognizes that even without any explicit endorsement or suppression of particular religions, laws/policies will still profoundly affect the prevalence of a religion through the ability of laws/policies to shape the contours of religious competition. Thus, legal discourse cannot hide behind a veil of religious neutrality and must confront the conversation as to what sort of religious competition – and consequent winner in the religious market – should be fostered by laws/policies.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofHKU-UNSW Research Symposium-
dc.titleLaw and Religious Market Theory-
dc.typeConference_Paper-
dc.identifier.emailChen, J: jianlin@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityChen, J=rp01530-
dc.identifier.hkuros259081-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats