File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1017/s0007114516001525
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-84973926524
- PMID: 27121045
- WOS: WOS:000377973400017
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Electronic Dietary Intake Assessment (e-DIA): relative validity of a mobile phone application to measure intake of food groups
Title | Electronic Dietary Intake Assessment (e-DIA): relative validity of a mobile phone application to measure intake of food groups |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Dietary assessment tool Food groups Food records LOA limits of agreement Mobile phone application Validation Young adults e-DIA electronic Dietary Intake Assessment |
Issue Date | 2016 |
Publisher | Cambridge University Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=BJN |
Citation | The British Journal of Nutrition, 2016, v. 115 n. 12, p. 2219-2226 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Automation of dietary assessment can reduce limitations of established methodologies, by alleviating participant and researcher burden. Designed as a research tool, the electronic Dietary Intake Assessment (e-DIA) is a food record in mobile phone application format. The present study aimed to examine the relative validity of the e-DIA with the 24-h recall method to estimate intake of food groups. A sample of eighty university students aged 19-24 years recorded 5 d of e-DIA and 3 d of recall within this 5-d period. The three matching days of dietary data were used for analysis. Food intake data were disaggregated and apportioned to one of eight food groups. Median intakes of food groups were similar between the methods, and strong correlations were found (mean: 0·79, range: 0·69-0·88). Cross-classification by tertiles produced a high level of exact agreement (mean: 71 %, range: 65-75 %), and weighted κ values were moderate to good (range: 0·54-0·71). Although mean differences (e-DIA-recall) were small (range: -13 to 23 g), limits of agreement (LOA) were relatively large (e.g. for vegetables, mean difference: -4 g, LOA: -159 to 151 g). The Bland-Altman plots showed robust agreement, with minimum bias. This analysis supports the use of e-DIA as an alternative to the repeated 24-h recall method for ranking individuals' food group intake. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/225484 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 3.0 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.911 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Rangan, AM | - |
dc.contributor.author | Tieleman, L | - |
dc.contributor.author | Louie, CYJ | - |
dc.contributor.author | Tang, LM | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hebden, L | - |
dc.contributor.author | Roy, R | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kay, J | - |
dc.contributor.author | Allman-Farinelli, M | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-05-18T02:04:34Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-05-18T02:04:34Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | The British Journal of Nutrition, 2016, v. 115 n. 12, p. 2219-2226 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0007-1145 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/225484 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Automation of dietary assessment can reduce limitations of established methodologies, by alleviating participant and researcher burden. Designed as a research tool, the electronic Dietary Intake Assessment (e-DIA) is a food record in mobile phone application format. The present study aimed to examine the relative validity of the e-DIA with the 24-h recall method to estimate intake of food groups. A sample of eighty university students aged 19-24 years recorded 5 d of e-DIA and 3 d of recall within this 5-d period. The three matching days of dietary data were used for analysis. Food intake data were disaggregated and apportioned to one of eight food groups. Median intakes of food groups were similar between the methods, and strong correlations were found (mean: 0·79, range: 0·69-0·88). Cross-classification by tertiles produced a high level of exact agreement (mean: 71 %, range: 65-75 %), and weighted κ values were moderate to good (range: 0·54-0·71). Although mean differences (e-DIA-recall) were small (range: -13 to 23 g), limits of agreement (LOA) were relatively large (e.g. for vegetables, mean difference: -4 g, LOA: -159 to 151 g). The Bland-Altman plots showed robust agreement, with minimum bias. This analysis supports the use of e-DIA as an alternative to the repeated 24-h recall method for ranking individuals' food group intake. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Cambridge University Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=BJN | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | The British Journal of Nutrition | - |
dc.rights | The British Journal of Nutrition. Copyright © Cambridge University Press. | - |
dc.subject | Dietary assessment tool | - |
dc.subject | Food groups | - |
dc.subject | Food records | - |
dc.subject | LOA limits of agreement | - |
dc.subject | Mobile phone application | - |
dc.subject | Validation | - |
dc.subject | Young adults | - |
dc.subject | e-DIA electronic Dietary Intake Assessment | - |
dc.title | Electronic Dietary Intake Assessment (e-DIA): relative validity of a mobile phone application to measure intake of food groups | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.email | Louie, CYJ: h0115648@graduate.hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Louie, CYJ=rp02118 | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_OA_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1017/s0007114516001525 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 27121045 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-84973926524 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 258410 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 115 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 12 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 2219 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 2226 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000377973400017 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0007-1145 | - |