File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Conference Paper: Personal Information Protection without a Public Right to Privacy: Revisiting the Recent Development of Chinese Law-making regarding Data Privacy and Surveillance

TitlePersonal Information Protection without a Public Right to Privacy: Revisiting the Recent Development of Chinese Law-making regarding Data Privacy and Surveillance
Authors
Issue Date2015
PublisherEuropean China Law Studies Association (ECLS).
Citation
The 10th Annual Conference of the European China Law Studies Association (ECLS) (欧洲中国法研究协会), Cologne, Germany 25-27 September 2015 How to Cite?
AbstractSince 2009 a series of laws, regulations and administrative rules have been made by the Chinese legislature as well as central administrative authorities to strengthen personal information protection, which has captured growing attention of Chinese and overseas jurists. It has been hailed that China is moving towards a data privacy regime which, albeit developing in a piecemeal way, follows the EU approach to embrace general principles of data protection. However, this optimistic view has overlooked the concurrent development of rule-making regarding the Party-State orangs’ collection, sharing and processing of personal information of Chinese citizens. Through reviewing those rules and judicial cases involving their application, this paper finds that the rules expand the scope of and increase the intensity of surveillance, including but not limited to imposing real name registration requirements on every aspect of the use of Internet and telecommunications. In particular, a major part of the rules were made by authorities that have parallel roles in the administrative system and the Party system, indicating an attempt to revive the Party’s close monitoring of, and hence direct control over, individuals’ behaviours in a largely marketized society. The paper argues that both the aforementioned privacy-enhancing rules and the surveillance-strengthening rules fail to provide any operable channel for citizen to challenge state surveillance measures that they deem as illegitimate, thus a general ‘public right to privacy’ which protects individual’s privacy from state invasions is yet to be established under the current legal system. Finally, the paper tries to offer different explanations on the paradoxical co-existence of privacy-enhancing law-making and surveillance-intensifying rule-making in China, and suggests the fields that need further research.
DescriptionSession 13: Investigating Legal Change in Divorce Law, Contract Law and Privacy Protection
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/222503

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChen, YC-
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-18T07:41:47Z-
dc.date.available2016-01-18T07:41:47Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationThe 10th Annual Conference of the European China Law Studies Association (ECLS) (欧洲中国法研究协会), Cologne, Germany 25-27 September 2015-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/222503-
dc.descriptionSession 13: Investigating Legal Change in Divorce Law, Contract Law and Privacy Protection-
dc.description.abstractSince 2009 a series of laws, regulations and administrative rules have been made by the Chinese legislature as well as central administrative authorities to strengthen personal information protection, which has captured growing attention of Chinese and overseas jurists. It has been hailed that China is moving towards a data privacy regime which, albeit developing in a piecemeal way, follows the EU approach to embrace general principles of data protection. However, this optimistic view has overlooked the concurrent development of rule-making regarding the Party-State orangs’ collection, sharing and processing of personal information of Chinese citizens. Through reviewing those rules and judicial cases involving their application, this paper finds that the rules expand the scope of and increase the intensity of surveillance, including but not limited to imposing real name registration requirements on every aspect of the use of Internet and telecommunications. In particular, a major part of the rules were made by authorities that have parallel roles in the administrative system and the Party system, indicating an attempt to revive the Party’s close monitoring of, and hence direct control over, individuals’ behaviours in a largely marketized society. The paper argues that both the aforementioned privacy-enhancing rules and the surveillance-strengthening rules fail to provide any operable channel for citizen to challenge state surveillance measures that they deem as illegitimate, thus a general ‘public right to privacy’ which protects individual’s privacy from state invasions is yet to be established under the current legal system. Finally, the paper tries to offer different explanations on the paradoxical co-existence of privacy-enhancing law-making and surveillance-intensifying rule-making in China, and suggests the fields that need further research.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherEuropean China Law Studies Association (ECLS). -
dc.relation.ispartofAnnual Conference of the European China Law Studies Association (ECLS)-
dc.titlePersonal Information Protection without a Public Right to Privacy: Revisiting the Recent Development of Chinese Law-making regarding Data Privacy and Surveillance-
dc.typeConference_Paper-
dc.identifier.emailChen, YC: yongxi@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.hkuros256600-
dc.publisher.placeGermany-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats