File Download
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
postgraduate thesis: Role and cost-effectiveness of biomarker testing in metastatic cancer treatment : policy implications
Title | Role and cost-effectiveness of biomarker testing in metastatic cancer treatment : policy implications |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2015 |
Publisher | The University of Hong Kong (Pokfulam, Hong Kong) |
Citation | Poon, K. G. [潘家銘]. (2015). Role and cost-effectiveness of biomarker testing in metastatic cancer treatment : policy implications. (Thesis). University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.5353/th_b5662739 |
Abstract | Background
Cancer is the top cause of death in Hong Kong and consumes a considerable amount of resources in treatment. The presence of biomarkers as a tool in selecting patients who are likely to benefit from cancer therapy present a challenge to local treatment protocol and policy as there are no specific guideline for biomarker testing. This paper aims to review the evidence of biomarker guided treatment and their cost-effectiveness using lung cancer as an example and recommend appropriate use of these test and relevant policy recommendation for use in cancer treatment.
Method
A systematic review was done using PubMed for relevant Phase III efficacy trials on Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR), Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) mutation in first-line setting and cost-effectiveness studies on testing for these two mutations.
Findings
For the efficacy review, 9 out of the 10 papers or articles met its efficacy primary endpoint. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the mostly used primary endpoint and all biomarker directed therapy favors longer PFS compared with chemotherapy comparator. None of those studies met the primary endpoint/secondary endpoint in improving overall survival. For the cost-effectiveness testing review, EGFR testing was found to be cost-effective in the Eastern-Asia context. EML4-ALK testing was not cost effective.
Conclusion
Targeted therapy towards EGFR mutation and EML4-ALK rearrangement was found to improve PFS in patients harboring these genetic abnormalities. Cost-effectiveness analysis show coupling EGFR testing with therapy is a promising approach whereas the test for EML4-ALK rearrangement in all lung cancer patients is not cost-effective. It reminded a policy question to screen for rare mutation like EML4-ALK depending on the ethical perspective taken by the health system. In such case, risk sharing and alternative financing model for rare biomarker can be considered. A reimbursement list for biomarker testing should be in place within Hospital Authority to increase transparency for patients. |
Degree | Master of Public Health |
Subject | Tumor markers Cancer - Treatment |
Dept/Program | Public Health |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/221863 |
HKU Library Item ID | b5662739 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Poon, Ka-ming, Gavin | - |
dc.contributor.author | 潘家銘 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-12-16T23:18:17Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2015-12-16T23:18:17Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Poon, K. G. [潘家銘]. (2015). Role and cost-effectiveness of biomarker testing in metastatic cancer treatment : policy implications. (Thesis). University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.5353/th_b5662739 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/221863 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background Cancer is the top cause of death in Hong Kong and consumes a considerable amount of resources in treatment. The presence of biomarkers as a tool in selecting patients who are likely to benefit from cancer therapy present a challenge to local treatment protocol and policy as there are no specific guideline for biomarker testing. This paper aims to review the evidence of biomarker guided treatment and their cost-effectiveness using lung cancer as an example and recommend appropriate use of these test and relevant policy recommendation for use in cancer treatment. Method A systematic review was done using PubMed for relevant Phase III efficacy trials on Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR), Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) mutation in first-line setting and cost-effectiveness studies on testing for these two mutations. Findings For the efficacy review, 9 out of the 10 papers or articles met its efficacy primary endpoint. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the mostly used primary endpoint and all biomarker directed therapy favors longer PFS compared with chemotherapy comparator. None of those studies met the primary endpoint/secondary endpoint in improving overall survival. For the cost-effectiveness testing review, EGFR testing was found to be cost-effective in the Eastern-Asia context. EML4-ALK testing was not cost effective. Conclusion Targeted therapy towards EGFR mutation and EML4-ALK rearrangement was found to improve PFS in patients harboring these genetic abnormalities. Cost-effectiveness analysis show coupling EGFR testing with therapy is a promising approach whereas the test for EML4-ALK rearrangement in all lung cancer patients is not cost-effective. It reminded a policy question to screen for rare mutation like EML4-ALK depending on the ethical perspective taken by the health system. In such case, risk sharing and alternative financing model for rare biomarker can be considered. A reimbursement list for biomarker testing should be in place within Hospital Authority to increase transparency for patients. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | The University of Hong Kong (Pokfulam, Hong Kong) | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | HKU Theses Online (HKUTO) | - |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
dc.rights | The author retains all proprietary rights, (such as patent rights) and the right to use in future works. | - |
dc.subject.lcsh | Tumor markers | - |
dc.subject.lcsh | Cancer - Treatment | - |
dc.title | Role and cost-effectiveness of biomarker testing in metastatic cancer treatment : policy implications | - |
dc.type | PG_Thesis | - |
dc.identifier.hkul | b5662739 | - |
dc.description.thesisname | Master of Public Health | - |
dc.description.thesislevel | Master | - |
dc.description.thesisdiscipline | Public Health | - |
dc.description.nature | published_or_final_version | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.5353/th_b5662739 | - |
dc.identifier.mmsid | 991018081619703414 | - |