File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.langsci.2013.09.001
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-84887532200
- WOS: WOS:000330085200007
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Things people speak?: A response to Orman's 'Linguistic diversity and language loss: A view from integrational linguistics' with rejoinder
| Title | Things people speak?: A response to Orman's 'Linguistic diversity and language loss: A view from integrational linguistics' with rejoinder |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Keywords | Integrational linguistics Ecolinguistics Ways of speaking Norf'k Linguistic diversity Language loss |
| Issue Date | 2013 |
| Citation | Language Sciences, 2013, v. 41, n. PB, p. 222-226 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | This article is presented in two parts. The first is a response to Orman's integrationist critique of orthodox theorising of linguistic diversity and language loss. It asks how integrationist claims might be empiricised and translated into a practical research programme. A discussion of the ontology of Norf'k and the pitfalls of employing metalinguistic terminology is followed by the second part: an argument claiming an integrationist investigation of language loss/death is possible if conceived as a lay-oriented enquiry. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/219725 |
| ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 1.3 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.419 |
| ISI Accession Number ID |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Nash, Joshua | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Orman, Jon | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2015-09-23T02:57:49Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2015-09-23T02:57:49Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2013 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Language Sciences, 2013, v. 41, n. PB, p. 222-226 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0388-0001 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/219725 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | This article is presented in two parts. The first is a response to Orman's integrationist critique of orthodox theorising of linguistic diversity and language loss. It asks how integrationist claims might be empiricised and translated into a practical research programme. A discussion of the ontology of Norf'k and the pitfalls of employing metalinguistic terminology is followed by the second part: an argument claiming an integrationist investigation of language loss/death is possible if conceived as a lay-oriented enquiry. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Language Sciences | - |
| dc.subject | Integrational linguistics | - |
| dc.subject | Ecolinguistics | - |
| dc.subject | Ways of speaking | - |
| dc.subject | Norf'k | - |
| dc.subject | Linguistic diversity | - |
| dc.subject | Language loss | - |
| dc.title | Things people speak?: A response to Orman's 'Linguistic diversity and language loss: A view from integrational linguistics' with rejoinder | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.langsci.2013.09.001 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-84887532200 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 41 | - |
| dc.identifier.issue | PB | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | 222 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | 226 | - |
| dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000330085200007 | - |
| dc.identifier.issnl | 0388-0001 | - |