File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199607617.013.36
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Book Chapter: Probability in ethics
Title | Probability in ethics |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Ethics Probability Expected utility theory Utilitarianism Egalitarianism |
Issue Date | 2016 |
Publisher | Oxford University Press |
Citation | Probability in ethics. In Hájek, A & Hitchcock, C (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Probability and Philosophy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2016 How to Cite? |
Abstract | It is natural to think that the most basic questions in ethical theory do not have much to do with probability. Given answers to these questions, we can try to extend them to cases involving probability, though this job might best be handled by more technical disciplines. This chapter is an argument for the opposite view. The major ethical problems to do with probability involve very little mathematics; many topics which seem to have nothing to do with probability are arguably all about probability; and thinking about various problems to do with probability can help solve analogous problems which do not involve probability, sometimes even revealing that popular positions about such problems are incoherent. Among the topics discussed are: interpretations of probability; expected utility theory; utilitarianism; egalitarianism; fairness; the priority view; population size; incommensurability; continuity; nonexpected utility theory; evaluative measurement; decision theory; act consequentialism; rule consequentialism; contractualism; and deontology. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/218448 |
ISBN |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | McCarthy, DP | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-09-18T06:37:50Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2015-09-18T06:37:50Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Probability in ethics. In Hájek, A & Hitchcock, C (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Probability and Philosophy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2016 | - |
dc.identifier.isbn | 9780199607617 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/218448 | - |
dc.description.abstract | It is natural to think that the most basic questions in ethical theory do not have much to do with probability. Given answers to these questions, we can try to extend them to cases involving probability, though this job might best be handled by more technical disciplines. This chapter is an argument for the opposite view. The major ethical problems to do with probability involve very little mathematics; many topics which seem to have nothing to do with probability are arguably all about probability; and thinking about various problems to do with probability can help solve analogous problems which do not involve probability, sometimes even revealing that popular positions about such problems are incoherent. Among the topics discussed are: interpretations of probability; expected utility theory; utilitarianism; egalitarianism; fairness; the priority view; population size; incommensurability; continuity; nonexpected utility theory; evaluative measurement; decision theory; act consequentialism; rule consequentialism; contractualism; and deontology. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Oxford University Press | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | The Oxford Handbook of Probability and Philosophy | - |
dc.subject | Ethics | - |
dc.subject | Probability | - |
dc.subject | Expected utility theory | - |
dc.subject | Utilitarianism | - |
dc.subject | Egalitarianism | - |
dc.title | Probability in ethics | - |
dc.type | Book_Chapter | - |
dc.identifier.email | McCarthy, DP: mccarthy@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | McCarthy, DP=rp01447 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199607617.013.36 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 250719 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 250718 | - |
dc.publisher.place | Oxford, UK | - |