File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.03.043
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-84905580498
- PMID: 24906602
- WOS: WOS:000341974900024
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Conference Paper: Multicenter international Randomized Comparison of Objective and Subjective Outcomes Between Electronic and Traditional Chest Drainage Systems
Title | Multicenter international Randomized Comparison of Objective and Subjective Outcomes Between Electronic and Traditional Chest Drainage Systems |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Drainage - instrumentation - methods Patient Satisfaction Pneumonectomy Electrical Equipment and Supplies Prospective Studies |
Issue Date | 2014 |
Publisher | Elsevier Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/athoracsur |
Citation | The 50th Annual Meeting of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS 2014), Orlando, FL., 25–29 January 2014. In The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2014, v. 98 n. 2, p. 490-497 How to Cite? |
Abstract | BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of digital versus traditional drainage devices on chest tube removal and patient satisfaction. METHODS: A randomized trial of digital versus traditional devices after lobectomy/segmentectomy was conducted at 4 international centers (United Kingdom, Europe, Asia, United States). Patients were managed with overnight suction followed by gravity drainage. Chest tubes were removed when an air leak was not evident anymore and the drained fluid was less than 400 mL/d. RESULTS: The groups (digital, 191 patients; traditional, 190 patients) were well matched for baseline and surgical characteristics. There were 325 lobectomies/bilobectomies and 56 segmentectomies, 308 of which were performed by video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). Patients randomized to digital systems had a significantly shorter air leak duration (1.0 versus 2.2 days; p=0.001), duration of chest tube placement (3.6 versus 4.7 days; p=0.0001), and postoperative length of stay (4.6 versus 5.6 days; p<0.0001). Subjective end points revealed a perceived improved ability to arise from bed (p=0.008), system convenience for patients and personnel (p=0.02), and the potential for being comfortable when discharged home with the device (p=0.06). A mean difference of 2.6 days from air leak cessation to tube removal was observed, which was similar in the 2 groups (p=0.7). Multivariable regression analysis showed that duration of chest tube placement after air leak cessation was directly associated with the amount of fluid drained during the first 48 hours (p=0.01) and the duration of air leak (p=0.008), independent of hospital location. CONCLUSIONS: Patients managed with digital drainage systems experienced a shorter duration of chest tube placement, shorter hospital stays, and higher satisfaction scores compared with those managed with traditional devices. Copyright © 2014 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. |
Description | Paper presented at the 15th Annual Meeting of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons ... 2014. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/215329 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 3.6 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.203 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Pompili, C | - |
dc.contributor.author | Detterbeck, F | - |
dc.contributor.author | Papagiannopoulos, K | - |
dc.contributor.author | Sihoe, A | - |
dc.contributor.author | Vachlas, K | - |
dc.contributor.author | Maxfield, MW | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lim, HC | - |
dc.contributor.author | Brunelli, A | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-08-21T13:22:14Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2015-08-21T13:22:14Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | The 50th Annual Meeting of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS 2014), Orlando, FL., 25–29 January 2014. In The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2014, v. 98 n. 2, p. 490-497 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0003-4975 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/215329 | - |
dc.description | Paper presented at the 15th Annual Meeting of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons ... 2014. | - |
dc.description.abstract | BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of digital versus traditional drainage devices on chest tube removal and patient satisfaction. METHODS: A randomized trial of digital versus traditional devices after lobectomy/segmentectomy was conducted at 4 international centers (United Kingdom, Europe, Asia, United States). Patients were managed with overnight suction followed by gravity drainage. Chest tubes were removed when an air leak was not evident anymore and the drained fluid was less than 400 mL/d. RESULTS: The groups (digital, 191 patients; traditional, 190 patients) were well matched for baseline and surgical characteristics. There were 325 lobectomies/bilobectomies and 56 segmentectomies, 308 of which were performed by video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). Patients randomized to digital systems had a significantly shorter air leak duration (1.0 versus 2.2 days; p=0.001), duration of chest tube placement (3.6 versus 4.7 days; p=0.0001), and postoperative length of stay (4.6 versus 5.6 days; p<0.0001). Subjective end points revealed a perceived improved ability to arise from bed (p=0.008), system convenience for patients and personnel (p=0.02), and the potential for being comfortable when discharged home with the device (p=0.06). A mean difference of 2.6 days from air leak cessation to tube removal was observed, which was similar in the 2 groups (p=0.7). Multivariable regression analysis showed that duration of chest tube placement after air leak cessation was directly associated with the amount of fluid drained during the first 48 hours (p=0.01) and the duration of air leak (p=0.008), independent of hospital location. CONCLUSIONS: Patients managed with digital drainage systems experienced a shorter duration of chest tube placement, shorter hospital stays, and higher satisfaction scores compared with those managed with traditional devices. Copyright © 2014 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Elsevier Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/athoracsur | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | The Annals of Thoracic Surgery | - |
dc.subject | Drainage - instrumentation - methods | - |
dc.subject | Patient Satisfaction | - |
dc.subject | Pneumonectomy | - |
dc.subject | Electrical Equipment and Supplies | - |
dc.subject | Prospective Studies | - |
dc.title | Multicenter international Randomized Comparison of Objective and Subjective Outcomes Between Electronic and Traditional Chest Drainage Systems | - |
dc.type | Conference_Paper | - |
dc.identifier.email | Sihoe, A: adls1@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Sihoe, A=rp01889 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.03.043 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 24906602 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-84905580498 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 247066 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 247117 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 98 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 2 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 490 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 497 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000341974900024 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | - |
dc.customcontrol.immutable | sml 150827 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0003-4975 | - |