File Download
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Conference Paper: Cognitive Contact Linguistics as an essential ingredient of diachronic construction grammar
| Title | Cognitive Contact Linguistics as an essential ingredient of diachronic construction grammar |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Issue Date | 2015 |
| Citation | The 13th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference (ICLC-13), Northumbria University, Newcastle, UK., 20-25 July 2015. How to Cite? |
| Abstract | BACKGROUND: “Diachronic construction grammar” is a field of investigation that brings together two, still relatively young, research traditions, which one could characterize as historical construction grammar and constructionist grammaticalization theory (Noël 2013). Both traditions deal with the (phylogenetic) development of “constructicons”, i.e. with evolutions in the constructional resources of languages, but they have come to this research focus from different angles, the latter being the result of a constructionist turn in grammaticalization theoretical thinking, while the former has launched off from synchronic constructionist linguistics, comprising work on schematization, “diachronic constructional semasiology” (Colleman & De Clerck 2011), “constructional attrition” (Colleman & Noël 2012) as well … |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/213581 |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Noel, D | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2015-08-06T04:09:34Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2015-08-06T04:09:34Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2015 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | The 13th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference (ICLC-13), Northumbria University, Newcastle, UK., 20-25 July 2015. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/213581 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | BACKGROUND: “Diachronic construction grammar” is a field of investigation that brings together two, still relatively young, research traditions, which one could characterize as historical construction grammar and constructionist grammaticalization theory (Noël 2013). Both traditions deal with the (phylogenetic) development of “constructicons”, i.e. with evolutions in the constructional resources of languages, but they have come to this research focus from different angles, the latter being the result of a constructionist turn in grammaticalization theoretical thinking, while the former has launched off from synchronic constructionist linguistics, comprising work on schematization, “diachronic constructional semasiology” (Colleman & De Clerck 2011), “constructional attrition” (Colleman & Noël 2012) as well … | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, ICLC-13 | - |
| dc.title | Cognitive Contact Linguistics as an essential ingredient of diachronic construction grammar | - |
| dc.type | Conference_Paper | - |
| dc.identifier.email | Noel, D: dnoel@hku.hk | - |
| dc.identifier.authority | Noel, D=rp01170 | - |
| dc.description.nature | postprint | - |
| dc.identifier.hkuros | 246928 | - |