File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Book Chapter: Emergent morphology

TitleEmergent morphology
Authors
Issue Date2016
PublisherJohn Benjamins Publishing
Citation
Emergent morphology. In Daniel Siddiqi & Heidi Harley (Eds.), Morphological metatheory, p. 235–268. Amsterdam ; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing, 2016 How to Cite?
AbstractThis paper examines implications for morpho-phonology of a model that minimizes the role of an innate linguistic endowment in grammar formation. ‘Bottom-up’ learning results in mental representations that form sets from perceived morphs but do not involve abstract ‘underlying’ representations. For production, syn- tactic/semantic features (S-features) identify morphs to be com- piled into words. When multiple morphs bear the same S-feature, the grammar must select among the possible contenders. Selection involves phonological regularities or sub-regularities and morpho- phonological as well as idiosyncratic choice; when all else fails the default morph is selected. The model unifies the formal character- ization of suppletion, sub-regularities, allophonic patterns, as well as unifying suppletion and zero morphs. Examples come from En- glish, Southern Min, Yoruba, and Kinande, and other languages.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/212486
ISBN
Series/Report no.Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today; v. 229

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorArchangeli, DB-
dc.contributor.authorPulleyblank, DG-
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-21T02:36:48Z-
dc.date.available2015-07-21T02:36:48Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationEmergent morphology. In Daniel Siddiqi & Heidi Harley (Eds.), Morphological metatheory, p. 235–268. Amsterdam ; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing, 2016-
dc.identifier.isbn9789027257123-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/212486-
dc.description.abstractThis paper examines implications for morpho-phonology of a model that minimizes the role of an innate linguistic endowment in grammar formation. ‘Bottom-up’ learning results in mental representations that form sets from perceived morphs but do not involve abstract ‘underlying’ representations. For production, syn- tactic/semantic features (S-features) identify morphs to be com- piled into words. When multiple morphs bear the same S-feature, the grammar must select among the possible contenders. Selection involves phonological regularities or sub-regularities and morpho- phonological as well as idiosyncratic choice; when all else fails the default morph is selected. The model unifies the formal character- ization of suppletion, sub-regularities, allophonic patterns, as well as unifying suppletion and zero morphs. Examples come from En- glish, Southern Min, Yoruba, and Kinande, and other languages.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherJohn Benjamins Publishing-
dc.relation.ispartofMorphological metatheory-
dc.relation.ispartofseriesLinguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today; v. 229-
dc.titleEmergent morphology-
dc.typeBook_Chapter-
dc.identifier.emailArchangeli, DB: darchang@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityArchangeli, DB=rp01748-
dc.identifier.hkuros244568-
dc.identifier.spage235-
dc.identifier.epage268-
dc.publisher.placeAmsterdam ; Philadelphia-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats