File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Book Chapter: Emergent morphology
| Title | Emergent morphology |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Issue Date | 2016 |
| Publisher | John Benjamins Publishing |
| Citation | Emergent morphology. In Daniel Siddiqi & Heidi Harley (Eds.), Morphological metatheory, p. 235–268. Amsterdam ; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing, 2016 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | This paper examines implications for morpho-phonology of a model that minimizes the role of an innate linguistic endowment in grammar formation. ‘Bottom-up’ learning results in mental representations that form sets from perceived morphs but do not involve abstract ‘underlying’ representations. For production, syn- tactic/semantic features (S-features) identify morphs to be com- piled into words. When multiple morphs bear the same S-feature, the grammar must select among the possible contenders. Selection involves phonological regularities or sub-regularities and morpho- phonological as well as idiosyncratic choice; when all else fails the default morph is selected. The model unifies the formal character- ization of suppletion, sub-regularities, allophonic patterns, as well as unifying suppletion and zero morphs. Examples come from En- glish, Southern Min, Yoruba, and Kinande, and other languages. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/212486 |
| ISBN | |
| Series/Report no. | Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today; v. 229 |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Archangeli, DB | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Pulleyblank, DG | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2015-07-21T02:36:48Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2015-07-21T02:36:48Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Emergent morphology. In Daniel Siddiqi & Heidi Harley (Eds.), Morphological metatheory, p. 235–268. Amsterdam ; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing, 2016 | - |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 9789027257123 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/212486 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | This paper examines implications for morpho-phonology of a model that minimizes the role of an innate linguistic endowment in grammar formation. ‘Bottom-up’ learning results in mental representations that form sets from perceived morphs but do not involve abstract ‘underlying’ representations. For production, syn- tactic/semantic features (S-features) identify morphs to be com- piled into words. When multiple morphs bear the same S-feature, the grammar must select among the possible contenders. Selection involves phonological regularities or sub-regularities and morpho- phonological as well as idiosyncratic choice; when all else fails the default morph is selected. The model unifies the formal character- ization of suppletion, sub-regularities, allophonic patterns, as well as unifying suppletion and zero morphs. Examples come from En- glish, Southern Min, Yoruba, and Kinande, and other languages. | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.publisher | John Benjamins Publishing | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Morphological metatheory | - |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today; v. 229 | - |
| dc.title | Emergent morphology | - |
| dc.type | Book_Chapter | - |
| dc.identifier.email | Archangeli, DB: darchang@hku.hk | - |
| dc.identifier.authority | Archangeli, DB=rp01748 | - |
| dc.identifier.hkuros | 244568 | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | 235 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | 268 | - |
| dc.publisher.place | Amsterdam ; Philadelphia | - |
