File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Nongovernmental International Human Rights Organizations: The Case of Hong Kong

TitleNongovernmental International Human Rights Organizations: The Case of Hong Kong
Authors
Issue Date2014
PublisherCambridge University Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=PSC
Citation
PS: Political Science & Politics, 2014, v. 47 n. 3, p. 642-653 How to Cite?
AbstractThis article examines the contributions of nongovernmental international human rights organizations (NGIHRO) in promoting a broad sense of human rights in hybrid regimes using the cases of Amnesty International Hong Kong (AIHK), Green Peace Hong Kong (GPHK), and Oxfam Hong Kong (OHK). It contends that NGIHROs have made significant contributions to public education and fund-raising in Hong Kong. However, with regard to the human rights conditions, it is erroneous to consider Hong Kong as part of the developed world. Together with other probable political considerations, doing so may have led to gaps in the organizations’ roles and functions as advocates for human rights in Hong Kong. In the final analysis, this article uses the political protests in Hong Kong to illustrate the importance of addressing the implications of demands for preserving the local identity and alternative lifestyles in the broader understanding of human rights.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/210614
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.2
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.919
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLam, WM-
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-19T09:47:27Z-
dc.date.available2015-06-19T09:47:27Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationPS: Political Science & Politics, 2014, v. 47 n. 3, p. 642-653-
dc.identifier.issn1049-0965-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/210614-
dc.description.abstractThis article examines the contributions of nongovernmental international human rights organizations (NGIHRO) in promoting a broad sense of human rights in hybrid regimes using the cases of Amnesty International Hong Kong (AIHK), Green Peace Hong Kong (GPHK), and Oxfam Hong Kong (OHK). It contends that NGIHROs have made significant contributions to public education and fund-raising in Hong Kong. However, with regard to the human rights conditions, it is erroneous to consider Hong Kong as part of the developed world. Together with other probable political considerations, doing so may have led to gaps in the organizations’ roles and functions as advocates for human rights in Hong Kong. In the final analysis, this article uses the political protests in Hong Kong to illustrate the importance of addressing the implications of demands for preserving the local identity and alternative lifestyles in the broader understanding of human rights.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherCambridge University Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=PSC-
dc.relation.ispartofPS: Political Science & Politics-
dc.rightsPS: Political Science & Politics. Copyright © Cambridge University Press.-
dc.titleNongovernmental International Human Rights Organizations: The Case of Hong Kong-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailLam, WM: lamwm@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityLam, WM=rp00569-
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S104909651400078X-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84903193663-
dc.identifier.hkuros243915-
dc.identifier.volume47-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage642-
dc.identifier.epage653-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000337970400010-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-
dc.identifier.issnl1049-0965-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats