Effect of water immersion on monomer and strength of FRC

Abstract

PURPOSE: There is an interest in the use of fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) to support the concept of minimal invasive dentistry. The exposure of FRC to the oral environment causes detrimental effect of water sorption (Takashi et al. Dent Mat 2006 22:291). With time water molecules will act as plasticizers and decrease the mechanical properties (Mese and Guzel. J Prosthet Dent 2008 99:153). Monomer system is the backbone of the dental composite (Garcia et al. Clinical Dentistry 2005: 215) and residual monomer may dissolve in water (Tanaka et al. J Oral Rehab 1991 18:353). Some released monomers are knownto elicit cytotoxic effects (Sakaguchi and Powers. Craig’s Restorative Dental Materials 2012:343), and methyl methacrylate (MMA) is mentioned as cytotoxic (Pradeep and Sreekumar. J Contemp Dent Pract 2012 6:838). This study investigated the effect of water immersion duration on monomer release and the compressive strength of fiber-reinforced composite. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Materials used were: E-glass fibre (Stick Tech, Finland), bis-GMA (Sigma–Aldrich, USA), MMA (ProSciTech, Australia), CQ (Esstech, USA) and CEMA (Esstech, USA). Fifteen specimens (2mm×2mm×25mm) with the composition of: 78.4% bis-GMA+19.6%MMA+ 1.0%CQ + 1.0%CEMA were prepared and divided into 2 groups: compressive strength (CS-12specimens) and residual monomer (RM-3specimens). Each specimen had two fiber rovings of 25mm and placed in a mould, and light-cured with halogen light-curing unit on both sides for 3×40 s. Specimens from each group were divided into three groups based on the water immersion durations (1, 14 and 21 days) and immersed into 10 ml distilled water at 37 ◦C. The three RM-specimens were analyzed using HPLC to test the residual monomer concentration. All CS-specimens were tested using UTM (Torsee’s UTM, Tokyo Testing Machine Mfg., Co., Ltd., Japan) for the compressive strength. RESULTS: The data of MMA concentration was descriptively analyzed. It started on day 1 (2352.96µg/ml) followed by an increase on day14 (3567.15µg/ml) and decreased on day 21 (2427.19µg/ml). Compressive strength showed an average (MPa) for day 1 (93.84±8.30); day 14 (67.83±4.82) and day 21 (51.08±2.10), respectively. Data from the compressive strength was analyzed by ANOVA, and it proved a significant decrease as the water immersion duration increases (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The duration of water immersion of e-glass FRC showed different effect on the concentration of released monomer and the compressive strength. Highest concentration of MMA concentration occurred on day 14 and followed by a decrease. As for the compressive strength, it decreased as the water immersion duration increased.