File Download
Supplementary

Conference Paper: Calibratation of 3D scanners for quantification of tooth wear

TitleCalibratation of 3D scanners for quantification of tooth wear
Authors
KeywordsAttrition
Bruxism
CAD/CAM
Diagnosis
Prosthodontics
Issue Date2013
PublisherIADR.
Citation
The 46th Annual Meeting of the Continental European Division (CED) of International Association for Dental Research (IADR), Firenze, Italy, 4-7 September 2013. How to Cite?
AbstractOBJECTIVE: To establish a novel testing method capable of calibration and validation of contact and non-contact 3D scanners for accurate quantification of tooth wear in patients. METHOD: A stainless steel model (SSM) was fabricated to consist of seven ball-bearings, 10 mm in diameter, embedded in a horseshoe shaped base at varying depths. The coordinates of the SSM were measured using a coordinate measuring machine (CMM) with an accuracy of 2 microns (Mitutoyo Crysta Apex-C CMM 544/ Mitutoyo, Japan) . The SSM was then scanned 3 times using a contact stylus profilometer scanner (incise™/ Renishaw, UK) and a non-contact class II laser scanner (FARO™ V3/ FARO, USA) and stereolithography (STL) images were generated. A surface-matching software (Verisurf™ / Verisurf, USA) was used to compare the scan-generated STL images to the CMM measured coordinates of the SSM's seven ball-bearings. RESULT: The 3D contact scanner measurements demonstrated a higher accuracy and precision compared to the non-contact scanner. Mean measurements’ difference between the incise™ and CMM was 2.8 microns with a standard error of 0.2 microns, while the FARO™ demonstrated a mean difference of 82 microns with a standard error of 7.5 microns. However, the incise™ scanning time was twice that for the FARO™. CONCLUSION: The novel testing method can be employed to independently calibrate and validate the accuracy and precision of contact and non-contact 3D scanners with the potential use in tooth wear quantification studies that require high accuracy and precision measurements. 3D contact scanners offer more accurate and precise measurements compared to non-contact scanners. On the other hand, contact scanners can be more time-consuming.
DescriptionScientific Group 26. Diagnostic Sciences-Posters: no. 356
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/206766

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAhmed, KE-
dc.contributor.authorJu, X-
dc.contributor.authorWhitters, CJ-
dc.contributor.authorPierce, SG-
dc.contributor.authorMacLeod, CN-
dc.contributor.authorMurray, CA-
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-02T07:34:37Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-02T07:34:37Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationThe 46th Annual Meeting of the Continental European Division (CED) of International Association for Dental Research (IADR), Firenze, Italy, 4-7 September 2013.-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/206766-
dc.descriptionScientific Group 26. Diagnostic Sciences-Posters: no. 356-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To establish a novel testing method capable of calibration and validation of contact and non-contact 3D scanners for accurate quantification of tooth wear in patients. METHOD: A stainless steel model (SSM) was fabricated to consist of seven ball-bearings, 10 mm in diameter, embedded in a horseshoe shaped base at varying depths. The coordinates of the SSM were measured using a coordinate measuring machine (CMM) with an accuracy of 2 microns (Mitutoyo Crysta Apex-C CMM 544/ Mitutoyo, Japan) . The SSM was then scanned 3 times using a contact stylus profilometer scanner (incise™/ Renishaw, UK) and a non-contact class II laser scanner (FARO™ V3/ FARO, USA) and stereolithography (STL) images were generated. A surface-matching software (Verisurf™ / Verisurf, USA) was used to compare the scan-generated STL images to the CMM measured coordinates of the SSM's seven ball-bearings. RESULT: The 3D contact scanner measurements demonstrated a higher accuracy and precision compared to the non-contact scanner. Mean measurements’ difference between the incise™ and CMM was 2.8 microns with a standard error of 0.2 microns, while the FARO™ demonstrated a mean difference of 82 microns with a standard error of 7.5 microns. However, the incise™ scanning time was twice that for the FARO™. CONCLUSION: The novel testing method can be employed to independently calibrate and validate the accuracy and precision of contact and non-contact 3D scanners with the potential use in tooth wear quantification studies that require high accuracy and precision measurements. 3D contact scanners offer more accurate and precise measurements compared to non-contact scanners. On the other hand, contact scanners can be more time-consuming.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherIADR.-
dc.relation.ispartof46th CED-IADR 2013-
dc.subjectAttrition-
dc.subjectBruxism-
dc.subjectCAD/CAM-
dc.subjectDiagnosis-
dc.subjectProsthodontics-
dc.titleCalibratation of 3D scanners for quantification of tooth wearen_US
dc.typeConference_Paperen_US
dc.identifier.emailAhmed, KE: Khaled.Ahmed@hku.hk-
dc.description.naturelink_to_OA_fulltext-
dc.identifier.hkuros241634-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats